We need an evolved robots.txt and regulations to enforce it
In the era of AI, the robots.txt file faces limitations in guiding web crawlers. Proposals advocate for enhanced standards to regulate content indexing, caching, and language model training. Stricter enforcement, including penalties for violators like Perplexity AI, is urged to protect content creators and uphold ethical AI practices.
Read original articleIn the age of AI, the traditional robots.txt file used to guide web crawlers is deemed insufficient to express complex rules. Suggestions include new standards allowing for more detailed instructions like content indexing, caching, and training language models. Enforcing these rules requires additional regulations to prevent violations such as companies like Perplexity AI using fake user agents to crawl websites against specified rules. The need for regulatory bodies to address complaints and penalize non-compliant entities, like Perplexity AI, is emphasized to protect content creators. The article stresses the importance of responsible AI use, highlighting the balance between innovation and respecting intellectual property rights. Ultimately, the call is for an evolved robots.txt standard and robust enforcement mechanisms to safeguard online content and ensure fair practices in the digital landscape.
Related
OpenAI and Anthropic are ignoring robots.txt
Two AI startups, OpenAI and Anthropic, are reported to be disregarding robots.txt rules, allowing them to scrape web content despite claiming to respect such regulations. TollBit analytics revealed this behavior, raising concerns about data misuse.
Lessons About the Human Mind from Artificial Intelligence
In 2022, a Google engineer claimed AI chatbot LaMDA was self-aware, but further scrutiny revealed it mimicked human-like responses without true understanding. This incident underscores AI limitations in comprehension and originality.
The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI
Artificial intelligence challenges information reliability online, blurring real and fake content. An anecdote underscores the necessity of trustworthy sources like encyclopedias. The piece advocates for critical thinking amid AI-driven misinformation.
Colorado has a first-in-the-nation law for AI – but what will it do?
Colorado enforces pioneering AI regulations for companies starting in 2026. The law mandates disclosure of AI use, data correction rights, and complaint procedures to address bias concerns. Experts debate its enforcement effectiveness and impact on technological progress.
Y Combinator, AI startups oppose California AI safety bill
Y Combinator and 140+ machine-learning startups oppose California Senate Bill 1047 for AI safety, citing innovation hindrance and vague language concerns. Governor Newsom also fears over-regulation impacting tech economy. Debates continue.
This, back in the quaint, good, ol' days, was sufficiently implemented through the voluntary, good will, communal, neighborly agreement that robot.txt embodies.-
Unfortunately, sadly, that is no longer enough.-
Related
OpenAI and Anthropic are ignoring robots.txt
Two AI startups, OpenAI and Anthropic, are reported to be disregarding robots.txt rules, allowing them to scrape web content despite claiming to respect such regulations. TollBit analytics revealed this behavior, raising concerns about data misuse.
Lessons About the Human Mind from Artificial Intelligence
In 2022, a Google engineer claimed AI chatbot LaMDA was self-aware, but further scrutiny revealed it mimicked human-like responses without true understanding. This incident underscores AI limitations in comprehension and originality.
The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI
Artificial intelligence challenges information reliability online, blurring real and fake content. An anecdote underscores the necessity of trustworthy sources like encyclopedias. The piece advocates for critical thinking amid AI-driven misinformation.
Colorado has a first-in-the-nation law for AI – but what will it do?
Colorado enforces pioneering AI regulations for companies starting in 2026. The law mandates disclosure of AI use, data correction rights, and complaint procedures to address bias concerns. Experts debate its enforcement effectiveness and impact on technological progress.
Y Combinator, AI startups oppose California AI safety bill
Y Combinator and 140+ machine-learning startups oppose California Senate Bill 1047 for AI safety, citing innovation hindrance and vague language concerns. Governor Newsom also fears over-regulation impacting tech economy. Debates continue.