June 25th, 2024

I Study Disinformation. This Election Will Be Grim.

Renée DiResta warns about the surge in election disinformation in the US, fueled by false claims of the 2020 election being stolen. She stresses the need to combat misinformation despite facing backlash and threats. The Stanford Internet Observatory had to adjust its focus due to pressures.

Read original articleLink Icon
I Study Disinformation. This Election Will Be Grim.

Renée DiResta, a former research director at the Stanford Internet Observatory, discusses the alarming rise of election disinformation in the United States. She highlights how false claims about the 2020 presidential election being stolen led to the events of January 6, 2021. DiResta explains how her team's efforts to counter misinformation were twisted into claims of censorship, leading to investigations and threats. As the 2024 election approaches, she warns of the increasing challenges posed by new social media platforms, AI-generated content, and foreign influence operations. DiResta emphasizes the importance of defending against disinformation and safeguarding the democratic process, despite facing backlash and intimidation. The Stanford Internet Observatory has had to refocus its work and discontinue certain projects due to the pressures and threats faced. DiResta calls for continued vigilance and outspokenness against attempts to silence researchers and undermine election integrity efforts.

Related

The hacking of culture and the creation of socio-technical debt

The hacking of culture and the creation of socio-technical debt

Algorithms shape culture, dividing it into niche groups. "A Hacker Manifesto" by McKenzie Wark discusses hackers' influence on power dynamics, emphasizing free information. Tech giants like Facebook and TikTok wield immense cultural influence, blurring propaganda and personalization boundaries. Corporate dominance in culture hacking alters global power structures, challenging governments' regulatory capacity.

Nobody knows what's going on

Nobody knows what's going on

Misinformation's impact on beliefs, reliance on unreliable sources, and human tendency to trust comforting information are discussed. Difficulty in discerning truth and consequences of widespread misinformation are highlighted.

KrebsOnSecurity Threatened with Defamation Lawsuit over Fake Radaris CEO

KrebsOnSecurity Threatened with Defamation Lawsuit over Fake Radaris CEO

KrebsOnSecurity faced a defamation lawsuit threat for exposing Radaris' true owners, the Lubarsky brothers, linked to questionable practices. Despite demands, KrebsOnSecurity stood by its reporting, revealing a complex web of interconnected businesses.

The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI

The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI

Artificial intelligence challenges information reliability online, blurring real and fake content. An anecdote underscores the necessity of trustworthy sources like encyclopedias. The piece advocates for critical thinking amid AI-driven misinformation.

Google: Stop Burning Counterterrorism Operations

Google: Stop Burning Counterterrorism Operations

Google's Project Zero and TAG exposed a U.S.-allied government's counterterrorism operation, sparking debate on the impact of revealing such information. Cyber operations play a crucial role in counterterrorism efforts, balancing intelligence gathering with minimizing risks.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @friend_and_foe - 5 months
I remember seeing a 4chan screenshot right before the 2020 election, I'd guess about 2 weeks before election night, the person was claiming to be an "insider" whatever that means, and they were claiming that on election night, all the news anchors were going to keep repeating the phrase "red mirage", and that they'd keep counting votes until Trump lost, however long that takes. I was not convinced for a ton of reasons, after all this is 4chan, the site full of Q conspiracies and racists and LARPs and other assorted bullshit. At the very least, if the person were telling the truth, then the cat is out of the bag and they can't go through with it.

I remember watching that anchor who's dad was a famous anchor, I forget his name, on Fox news that night say the phrase "red mirage". They counted votes for 3 days after that.

> If the rumor was found to be false — and it usually was — corrections were rarely made and even then, little noticed.

This is rich coming from an MSM rag, doubly so for NYT.