June 25th, 2024

Why American tech companies need to help build AI weaponry

U.S. tech companies play a crucial role in AI weaponry development for future warfare. Authors stress military supremacy, ethical considerations, and urge societal debate on military force and AI weaponry. Tech industry faces resistance over military projects.

Read original articleLink Icon
Why American tech companies need to help build AI weaponry

The article discusses the role of U.S. tech companies in developing AI weaponry, arguing that the future of warfare will be driven by artificial intelligence. The authors, Alexander C. Karp and Nicholas W. Zamiska, emphasize the importance of maintaining military supremacy and the need for ethical societies to possess more powerful weapons than potential adversaries to act as effective deterrents. They criticize the reluctance of many engineers, particularly in Silicon Valley, to engage with the military due to moral concerns, redirecting resources towards consumer culture instead. The authors highlight the necessity of a societal debate on the use of military force and the development of AI weaponry. They caution against the technology sector's focus on trivial consumer concerns, urging a shift towards addressing significant societal challenges. The article also touches on instances where tech employees protested against projects involving military applications, showcasing a growing trend of resistance within the industry. Ultimately, the authors advocate for a more nuanced approach to power dynamics and the development of autonomous weapons systems for military use.

Related

AI is exhausting the power grid

AI is exhausting the power grid

Tech firms, including Microsoft, face a power crisis due to AI's energy demands straining the grid and increasing emissions. Fusion power exploration aims to combat fossil fuel reliance, but current operations heavily impact the environment.

AI's $600B Question

AI's $600B Question

The AI industry's revenue growth and market dynamics are evolving, with a notable increase in the revenue gap, now dubbed AI's $600B question. Nvidia's dominance and GPU data centers play crucial roles. Challenges like pricing power and investment risks persist, emphasizing the importance of long-term innovation and realistic perspectives.

Merlin Labs aims to test an AI-powered KC-135 within a year

Merlin Labs aims to test an AI-powered KC-135 within a year

Two startups, Merlin Labs and EpiSci, collaborate to develop self-flying tankers and advanced AI for dogfighting. They aim to create AI pilots to reduce human pilot dependency in Air Force missions.

The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI

The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI

Artificial intelligence challenges information reliability online, blurring real and fake content. An anecdote underscores the necessity of trustworthy sources like encyclopedias. The piece advocates for critical thinking amid AI-driven misinformation.

Tech's accountability tantrum is pathetic

Tech's accountability tantrum is pathetic

Silicon Valley tech giants criticized for lack of accountability and ethical behavior. Companies like Uber, Amazon, Google, and individuals like Elon Musk prioritize innovation over laws and ethics. Resistance to oversight and lobbying against regulations noted. Importance of accountability stressed to prevent societal harm.

Link Icon 10 comments
By @bithive123 - 4 months
First we invent a machine to kill, then someone invents a machine to kill that machine, and so on. We call this progress. An endless cycle of violence perpetuated by the pursuit of one group's security at the expense of another's.

Is warfare a fact of life? Maybe. But to take actions which logically and demonstrably create the very insecurity they are meant to avoid is irrational. Point this out and you are branded an idealist. "Humanity is doomed to violence, so always be ready to kill" is apparently sage wisdom.

By @lambdaone - 4 months
It's not a foregone conclusion. We have managed to ban chemical weapons. laser blinding weapons and biological weapons on a global scale. If there was sufficient will to do so, we could do this for autonomous weapons as well.

The argument that "bad people will do X", so we must do X to them first, is a race to the bottom.

This article is, however, very revealing about what Palantir wants to happen, without ever mentioning the profit motive.

By @drlemonpepper - 4 months
By @Havoc - 4 months
The whole human in the loop thing sure seems to be getting quieter by the minute.
By @more_corn - 4 months
No.
By @uncertainrhymes - 4 months
I agree with very little of this, but good to know what Palantir thinks we should be spending our effort on.
By @z5h - 4 months
When does AI become smart enough to “lift all boats”?
By @richardatlarge - 4 months
Make code, not war
By @Aerbil313 - 4 months
> The record of humanity’s management of the [nuclear] weapon — imperfect and, indeed, dozens of times nearly catastrophic — has been remarkable. Nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great-power military conflict.

This is so offensive. I am infuriated. The last hundred years has been anything but peace for Middle East. You can continue not caring from SF.