June 26th, 2024

Namecheap Takes Down Polyfill.io Service Following Supply Chain Attack

Namecheap took down Polyfill.io due to a supply chain attack. Malware was distributed to 110,000 websites, redirecting mobile users to a betting site. Google warned affected pages. Users should remove Polyfill.io and consider alternatives like Cloudflare or Fastly.

Read original articleLink Icon
Namecheap Takes Down Polyfill.io Service Following Supply Chain Attack

Namecheap has taken down the Polyfill.io service due to a supply chain attack. The service, which was sold to a Chinese company, has been serving malware through its CDN to over 110,000 websites. The malware injected by the new owners redirects mobile users to a sports betting site. Notable users affected include Atlassian, Sendgrid, and government websites. Google has issued warnings to impacted landing pages. The original Polyfill.js library, created by FT.com, aimed to ensure compatibility with older browsers. Following the ownership transfer, concerns about the service's compromise were raised, leading to its removal by Namecheap. Alternatives like Cloudflare and Fastly are now available. Users are advised to remove cdn.polyfill.io from their sites, search for instances in their code, or consider self-hosting. This incident underscores the importance of auditing third-party services for trustworthiness and monitoring dependencies regularly to prevent future attacks.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @ryan29 - 4 months
They criticize Namecheap for being slow, but is 1 day slow? Who here would pull the plug on a domain relied on by hundreds of thousands of sites faster than that? I get the desire to shut it down instantly, but do we really want registrars taking domains offline in less than a day?

There’s got to be significant liability concerns when you’re doing something that could impact hundreds of thousands of sites. It’s kind of a tough spot to be in, isn’t it?

By @xacky - 4 months
This is why Mozilla should stop bothering with the ESR version of Firefox. Too many features of it have to be polyfilled. The ESR cycle made sense when XUL was a thing, but now the extension APIs have been overhauled it should be easier for everyone to use the same browser version and tell outdated browsers to upgrade instead of having to backport features. Microsoft is also to blame here by making new versions of Windows abusive so people stick with outdated OS versions which only have ESR browsers. I just hope someone finds an unpatchable flaw in MS accounts so Microsoft is forced to go back to local accounts in Windows 12.
By @gary_0 - 4 months
Out of curiosity, does anyone know of any other cases of registrars taking down domains for serving malware? Is this a common practice?
By @bn-l - 4 months
> Polyfill.io has been serving malware for months via its CDN, after the project's open source maintainer sold the service to a company based in China.

Nobody could have predicted this /s