June 27th, 2024

SpaceX building NASA craft to destroy the International Space Station

SpaceX secures an $843 million NASA contract to construct the "U.S. Deorbit Vehicle" for the intentional destruction of the ISS in 2030. NASA plans to replace the ISS with private space stations.

Read original articleLink Icon
SpaceX building NASA craft to destroy the International Space Station

SpaceX has been awarded an $843 million contract by NASA to build the "U.S. Deorbit Vehicle" that will guide the intentional destruction of the International Space Station (ISS) after its retirement in 2030. The spacecraft will push the ISS into reentry from orbit, ensuring a controlled and safe deorbit process to avoid risks to populated areas. NASA highlighted the importance of preparing for the ISS's safe destruction and mentioned that alternatives like disassembling the station in orbit were considered but deemed technically or economically infeasible. The ISS, which has been crewed since 2000 and served as a research laboratory for various experiments, is facing challenges like microscopic leaks. NASA is planning to replace the ISS with private space stations through programs like Commercial LEO Destinations, aiming to reduce costs compared to the ISS's $150 billion development and $4 billion annual operating expenses. The decision to destroy the ISS was based on a study evaluating preservation and reuse options, ultimately concluding that extending its operational lifetime beyond 2030 would require further assessment and international agreements.

Link Icon 10 comments
By @drpossum - 4 months
This is an egregiously bad clickbait headline that implies SpaceX is building something nefarious. This is for a planned end-of-life deorbit in several years and technically it is not the craft that will destroy it (that's the reentry's job), it's to do the deorbit in a controlled way.

Here's the thread from yesterday

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40804856

By @sen - 4 months
How accurately can they really de-orbit such a colossal object with so many parts that are bound to break off?

Is this a “it’s fine, they can model it so well that they’ll target a couple hundred square kilometres in the middle of the ocean” thing or a “pieces will be spread across many thousands of kilometres, but it probably won’t hit anyone because the earth is really big..” thing.

By @evolve2k - 4 months
“… the agency sees privately built space stations as a way to replace the ISS at a fraction of the cost.”

Of the upfront cost maybe, but it’s like moving from being the landlord to being the renter where there’s only a couple bungalows on the island.

Costs be going way up year on year. Short sighted reasoning.

By @adwf - 4 months
They should just ask Boeing to build a rocket to keep it in orbit, would be cheaper...
By @riffraff - 4 months
I'm sad they didn't decide to push it away.

I imagine it would have required an insane amount of energy, but it would have been cool to imagine it drifting off, a-la "Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets".

By @gnabgib - 4 months
Discussion (101 points, 21 hours ago, 126 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40804856
By @tzfld - 4 months
Expecting great onboard stream of the deorbit process.
By @doingtheiroming - 4 months
Surely they could just ask China.
By @pjio - 4 months
... after retiring