June 28th, 2024

The Dream of an Alpine Waterway

Pietro Caminada's ambitious 1907 project aimed to build a canal system over the Alps for cargo ships. Despite challenges, his legacy endures through a road named after him, showcasing his lasting impact.

Read original articleLink Icon
The Dream of an Alpine Waterway

Pietro Caminada, a Swiss-Italian engineer, envisioned a groundbreaking project in 1907 to create a navigable waterway over the Alps for cargo ships without mechanical propulsion. His plan involved a 591-kilometer canal system with lock chambers that would allow ships to ascend and descend through natural buoyancy. Despite skepticism from some experts, Caminada received praise from influential figures like King Vittorio Emanuele III of Italy. However, economic and social challenges in Italy led to the project's eventual abandonment. Caminada continued to believe in his transalpine shipping dream until his death in 1923. His legacy lives on through a country road named 'Via Pietro Caminada' between Rome and the Tyrrhenian Sea. Despite the project never coming to fruition, Caminada's innovative vision and determination left a lasting impact on the realm of transportation engineering.

Link Icon 8 comments
By @dredmorbius - 4 months
I'm not an expert in this area, though the efficiencies of canal systems have interested me greatly in recent years. What's interesting to me is that even today, few canal systems seem to have elevation gains of more than a few metres.

Among the greatest lifts I'm aware of are the Erie Canal (no longer commercially operated, though accessible by pleasure craft), which rises 174m (571 ft) above sea level. Canada's Trent-Severn Waterway origionates on Lake Ontario at 74m (243 ft) elevation. The Panama Canal rises only 26m (85 ft) to Lake Gatun. And the Suez Canal operates without locks.

Which makes the 1,200 m gain of Caminada's proposal all the more audacious. And ... perhaps ... impractical.

By @K0balt - 4 months
There’s no violation of physics here, simply the energy transfer of potential energy from water moving downhill.

Given a sufficient source of water above the highest tunnel, this seems like a remarkably efficient system, if almost certainly not economically viable to construct or maintain.

If we simplify a bit and assume that all tunnels are of the same size, with the volume of water needed to fill one tunnel plus the net displacement of the freight going up versus down, every barge in every tunnel is moved one tunnel forward on each slope, going up or down one side of the system. It’s interesting because there is automatic energy recovery “regenerative braking” because the displacement of the descending freight reduces the water consumption in proportion to the amount used to raise an equal amount of ascending freight. Pretty cool.

It would probably be more cost effective to use that same water source to build a hydroelectric powered electric locomotive, but -theoretically- the canal system should be able to move more freight.

In practice, i would bet on the railway, especially if descending trains fed energy back into the system to help power ascending ones. As for economics of construction and maintenance, the train would probably be orders of magnitude more cost effective.

Nonetheless, an elegant idea with an idyllic implementation. Kind of has a “clever” code smell though lol.

By @Animats - 4 months
That thing is scary. If a boat on an uphill tunnel doesn't keep moving forward to keep up with the rising water, the boat is forced against the top of the tunnel and everybody drowns.
By @drewcoo - 4 months
> Newton’s apple fell from the tree for the same reason as water flows downwards

For the sake of the narrative?

By @johnea - 4 months
The article describes it as some kind of magical thginnking, but it is possible to cross Europe by boat.

There are a couple of canal systems:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhine-Main-Danube_Canal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canal_du_Midi

By @ano-ther - 4 months
Is there a demonstration of the locks somewhere? From the patent it sounds like a tunnel that gets flooded which lifts the ship. The tunnel must be really large because it has to fit the ship at an angle and not just head on.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US955317A/en

By @AtlasBarfed - 4 months
Johnny canal approves
By @ur-whale - 4 months
This was back in the days when folks in Europe were still capable of doing really ambitious technical things.

That particular project may have turned not to be economically viable, but it was at the very least thought of and studied seriously.

That kind of burning flame has now died miserably, and all Europe is now capable of doing is keeping the lights on.