How much memory does a call to 'malloc' allocates? – Daniel Lemire's blog
The malloc function in C allocates memory on the heap. Allocating 1 byte may result in 16-24 bytes due to overhead. Avoid small allocations and focus on broader concepts for efficient memory management.
Read original articleIn C programming, the malloc function is used to allocate memory on the heap. When calling malloc(1) to allocate just one byte, modern systems typically allocate virtual memory, which may or may not correspond to physical memory. There is a fixed overhead per allocation, usually around 8 bytes of metadata, which the system uses to track memory allocations. Due to alignment and minimum size requirements, requesting 1 byte may actually result in receiving between 16 to 24 bytes of usable memory. It is advised to avoid allocating very small blocks of memory and not to optimize allocation size down to a few bytes since it gets rounded up anyway. The realloc function can be used to extend memory allocations efficiently. Different systems handle memory allocation differently, so it's best to focus on the broader concepts rather than making generalizations about specific systems like Linux or macOS. Overall, understanding how malloc works and its implications on memory usage is crucial for efficient memory management in programming.
Related
Memory sealing for the GNU C Library
The GNU C Library introduces mseal() system call for enhanced security by preventing address space changes. Adhemerval Zanella's patch series adds support, improving memory manipulation protection in upcoming releases.
Exploring How Cache Memory Works
Cache memory, crucial for programmers, stores data inside the CPU for quick access, bridging the CPU-RAM speed gap. Different cache levels vary in speed and capacity, optimizing performance and efficiency.
Tracing garbage collection for arenas
Tracing garbage collection in systems programming languages like C++, Rust, and Ada is compared to reference counting. A simplified tracing garbage collection approach inspired by Mark-and-Sweep is proposed for languages like Zig or Odin.
How GCC and Clang handle statically known undefined behaviour
Discussion on compilers handling statically known undefined behavior (UB) in C code reveals insights into optimizations. Compilers like gcc and clang optimize based on undefined language semantics, potentially crashing programs or ignoring problematic code. UB avoidance is crucial for program predictability and security. Compilers differ in handling UB, with gcc and clang showing variations in crash behavior and warnings. LLVM's 'poison' values allow optimizations despite UB, reflecting diverse compiler approaches. Compiler responses to UB are subjective, influenced by developers and user requirements.
The C Standard charter was updated, now with security principles as well
The ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG14 committee oversees C Standard development, focusing on portability, efficiency, and stability. Collaboration with the C++ committee ensures compatibility. Principles guide feature integration, code efficiency, security, and adaptability.
They made it into a competition and it was so much fun (graded on latency and efficient space usage). I remember the person who won was a PhD student who had to take the undergrad course as a prereq for some Grade level class.
Related
Memory sealing for the GNU C Library
The GNU C Library introduces mseal() system call for enhanced security by preventing address space changes. Adhemerval Zanella's patch series adds support, improving memory manipulation protection in upcoming releases.
Exploring How Cache Memory Works
Cache memory, crucial for programmers, stores data inside the CPU for quick access, bridging the CPU-RAM speed gap. Different cache levels vary in speed and capacity, optimizing performance and efficiency.
Tracing garbage collection for arenas
Tracing garbage collection in systems programming languages like C++, Rust, and Ada is compared to reference counting. A simplified tracing garbage collection approach inspired by Mark-and-Sweep is proposed for languages like Zig or Odin.
How GCC and Clang handle statically known undefined behaviour
Discussion on compilers handling statically known undefined behavior (UB) in C code reveals insights into optimizations. Compilers like gcc and clang optimize based on undefined language semantics, potentially crashing programs or ignoring problematic code. UB avoidance is crucial for program predictability and security. Compilers differ in handling UB, with gcc and clang showing variations in crash behavior and warnings. LLVM's 'poison' values allow optimizations despite UB, reflecting diverse compiler approaches. Compiler responses to UB are subjective, influenced by developers and user requirements.
The C Standard charter was updated, now with security principles as well
The ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG14 committee oversees C Standard development, focusing on portability, efficiency, and stability. Collaboration with the C++ committee ensures compatibility. Principles guide feature integration, code efficiency, security, and adaptability.