The Center for Investigative Reporting Is Suing OpenAI and Microsoft
The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) sues OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, alleging unauthorized use of stories impacting relationships and revenue. Legal action mirrors media concerns over tech companies using journalistic content without permission.
Read original article
The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) is suing OpenAI and Microsoft for alleged copyright infringement. CIR, known for producing Mother Jones and Reveal, claims that the two AI giants used their stories without permission or compensation, impacting their relationships with readers and revenue. This legal action follows similar lawsuits by The New York Times and other media outlets. While some organizations have signed licensing deals with OpenAI, CIR's lawsuit highlights concerns over the unauthorized use of journalistic content. OpenAI stated they are collaborating with the news industry to display content in their products like ChatGPT, aiming to drive traffic back to original articles. The lawsuit reflects a broader trend of media organizations and authors taking legal action against tech companies for copyright violations. OpenAI and Microsoft have not yet responded to requests for comment on the matter.
Related
OpenAI and Anthropic are ignoring robots.txt
Two AI startups, OpenAI and Anthropic, are reported to be disregarding robots.txt rules, allowing them to scrape web content despite claiming to respect such regulations. TollBit analytics revealed this behavior, raising concerns about data misuse.
Microsoft says that it's okay to steal web content it because it's 'freeware.'
Microsoft's CEO of AI, Mustafa Suleyman, believes web content is "freeware" for AI training unless specified otherwise. This stance has sparked legal disputes and debates over copyright infringement and fair use in AI content creation.
Microsoft CEO of AI Your online content is 'freeware' fodder for training models
Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, faced legal action for using online content as "freeware" to train neural networks. The debate raises concerns about copyright, AI training, and intellectual property rights.
Microsoft AI CEO: Web content is 'freeware'
Microsoft's CEO discusses AI training on web content, emphasizing fair use unless restricted. Legal challenges arise over scraping restrictions, highlighting the balance between fair use and copyright concerns for AI development.
Microsofts AI boss thinks its perfectly OK to steal content if its on open web
Microsoft's AI boss, Mustafa Suleyman, challenges copyright norms by advocating for free use of online content. His stance triggers debates on AI ethics and copyright laws in the digital era.
0 commentsRelated
OpenAI and Anthropic are ignoring robots.txt
Two AI startups, OpenAI and Anthropic, are reported to be disregarding robots.txt rules, allowing them to scrape web content despite claiming to respect such regulations. TollBit analytics revealed this behavior, raising concerns about data misuse.
Microsoft says that it's okay to steal web content it because it's 'freeware.'
Microsoft's CEO of AI, Mustafa Suleyman, believes web content is "freeware" for AI training unless specified otherwise. This stance has sparked legal disputes and debates over copyright infringement and fair use in AI content creation.
Microsoft CEO of AI Your online content is 'freeware' fodder for training models
Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, faced legal action for using online content as "freeware" to train neural networks. The debate raises concerns about copyright, AI training, and intellectual property rights.
Microsoft AI CEO: Web content is 'freeware'
Microsoft's CEO discusses AI training on web content, emphasizing fair use unless restricted. Legal challenges arise over scraping restrictions, highlighting the balance between fair use and copyright concerns for AI development.
Microsofts AI boss thinks its perfectly OK to steal content if its on open web
Microsoft's AI boss, Mustafa Suleyman, challenges copyright norms by advocating for free use of online content. His stance triggers debates on AI ethics and copyright laws in the digital era.