June 30th, 2024

Unification in Elixir

Pattern matching in Elixir, inspired by Erlang and Prolog, includes unification for equality assertion and variable assignment. Unification handles terms, variables, and lists, allowing for symbolic equation solving efficiently.

Read original articleLink Icon
Unification in Elixir

Pattern matching is a fundamental feature in Elixir, inspired by Erlang's roots in Prolog. Unification, a two-sided pattern matching technique, asserts equality and assigns variables accordingly. In Elixir, unification operates on terms, which can be variables, atomic values, or lists of terms. Successful unification results in a substitution mapping variables to values. Unlike Elixir's pattern matching, unification allows for partially known values, enabling powerful symbolic equation solving. Unification examples illustrate successful and failed matches, showcasing the flexibility and constraints of the process. Variables play a crucial role in unification, representing placeholders for values that must align across terms. The implementation of unification involves walking through terms, testing equivalence, handling variables, and unifying lists recursively. By leveraging Elixir's pattern matching capabilities and substitution mappings, unification offers a structured approach to solving symbolic equations efficiently.

Related

The plan-execute pattern

The plan-execute pattern

The plan-execute pattern in software engineering involves planning decisions in a data structure before execution, aiding testing and debugging. Practical examples and benefits are discussed, emphasizing improved code quality and complexity management.

Elixir Gotchas

Elixir Gotchas

The article highlights common pitfalls in Elixir programming, including confusion between charlists and strings, differences in pattern matching, struct behavior, accessing struct fields, handling keyword lists, and unique data type comparisons.

Elixir for Python Developers

Elixir for Python Developers

This comparison delves into Python and Elixir, emphasizing syntax disparities and distinctive traits. Elixir prioritizes immutability and pattern matching, while Python focuses on object-oriented elements. Both share list comprehensions and parallel processing, yet Elixir's functional approach and pattern matching distinguish it. Elixir's Stream module supports lazy operations for big data, contrasting Python's I/O streams. Python developers can benefit from exploring Elixir.

Elixir for Humans Who Know Python

Elixir for Humans Who Know Python

The article explores transitioning from Python to Elixir, emphasizing Elixir's concurrency, Phoenix framework, LiveView feature, immutability, and pattern matching. It compares Elixir's functionalism and control flow to Python, showcasing Elixir's efficiency for web development.

Elixir Anti-Patterns

Elixir Anti-Patterns

The document discusses code-related anti-patterns in Elixir v1.18.0-dev, highlighting issues like comments overuse, complex 'with' expressions, dynamic atom creation, long parameter lists, and namespace conventions. It provides examples and refactoring suggestions to improve code quality and maintainability.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @contificate - 7 months
It is worth noting that lots of applications of unification do not reify explicit substitutions in their implementations. You often see introductory type inference articles (usually focused on Hindley-Milner) use algorithm W, which uses a unification procedure that returns substitutions (which must then be composed with other substitutions). All of this is less efficient and arguably more error-prone and more complicated than the destructive unification implied by algorithm J (using the union-find data structure, often implemented invasively into the type representation to imply a union-find forest).

To this end, good coverage of decent (destructive) unification algorithms can be found in any simple resource on type inference (https://okmij.org/ftp/ML/generalization/sound_eager.ml) or the Warren Abstract Machine (https://github.com/a-yiorgos/wambook/blob/master/wambook.pdf).

Of course, there are times where you would want to reify substitutions as a data structure to compose and apply, but most of the time you just want to immediately apply them in a pervasive way.

Despite what another comment says, unification is a valid - and rather convenient - way to implement pattern matching (as in the style of ML) in an interpreter: much like how you rewrite type variables with types you are unifying them with, you can rewrite the pattern variables to refer to the parts of the (evaluated) value you are matching against (which you then use to extend the environment with when evaluating the right hand side).

By @ReleaseCandidat - 7 months
While I'm at (free) books: a great example implementation of unification (in Lisp) is in chapter 11 "Logic Programming" of Peter Norvig's "Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence Programming: Case Studies in Common Lisp".

https://github.com/norvig/paip-lisp

There is also an implementation in Python, but I have never tested it, just googled it now: https://github.com/dhconnelly/paip-python/blob/master/prolog...

https://dhconnelly.github.io/paip-python/docs/prolog.html

By @ReleaseCandidat - 7 months
Type checking (type inference) is the usual application of unification in programming languages (compilers or interpreters). Pattern matching does not need unification, because, as mentioned in the beginning of post, the "matching" is done one the left side only (no variables to "match" on the right side).