June 30th, 2024

UK's Housing Crisis Needs a London-Sized City to Fix It

The UK faces a severe housing crisis, needing to build a city the size of London to catch up with decades of under-construction. Both parties promise solutions, but challenges hinder progress.

Read original articleLink Icon
UK's Housing Crisis Needs a London-Sized City to Fix It

The UK is facing a severe housing crisis, with a shortage of homes equivalent to building another city the size of London to catch up with five decades of below-target construction. Developers and local authorities have failed to keep up with population growth, leading to the worst housing crisis since World War II. Both major political parties promise to increase building rates, but it would take 14 years to address the shortage even at the pace seen in the 1970s. The crisis has driven up house prices, pricing out many younger Britons and making housing a top concern for adults. Bottlenecks in the planning system and resistance from existing homeowners have hindered progress. The housing shortage not only impacts individuals but also limits the nation's growth potential and productivity. The crisis is felt most acutely in areas with high migration and poor planning, exacerbating issues like rising homelessness and city-wide housing crunches. Efforts to address the crisis include proposed planning reforms and building on certain parts of the Green Belt, but political challenges and historical policy decisions have complicated solutions.

Link Icon 8 comments
By @addicted - 4 months
Seems weird that so many of the comments are complaining about immigration (the depletion of which has fucked the NHS, for example) in an article which is talking about the UK not keeping up with building housing for 5 decades, and even if they’d kept pace with many peer European countries they would have had a London’s worth more housing.
By @jbu - 4 months
I keep hearing this, and it doesn't make sense. We don't have a london-sized tent city anywhere. But we have generations that can't afford to buy a home, and the rental market is brutal, but we have piles of london 'investment properties' sold offshore and then left empty as speculation (and other market distortions). We have enough houses, but we distribute them badly.

was talking about this with a friend who knows more. He did point out we need to replace old housing stock, which we also don't do, so just have cold, mouldy old houses. But that's not what's being talked about here.

I also had a twitter conv with a housing charity once, who agreed but pointed out that the financialization of property is hard to overturn, and it's easier to just advocate for more building. Problem I see here is that the new buildings will just be more stock for existing portfolios, and actual prices don't seem to reduce.

By @bufio - 4 months
Rapidly increasing the population in this situation is probably not the smartest policy.
By @NoPicklez - 4 months
This is identical to the problem we have here in Australia

Record immigration allowed, without anywhere near the housing to support it

By @mamonster - 4 months
Didn't even need to have the years on the X-axis for the first graph to know exactly when (and why) the underbuilding took off. Great job Maggie.
By @smileybarry - 4 months
Unpaywalled mirror, saved by archive.today/archive.md:

http://archive.today/2024.06.25-155719/https://www.bloomberg...

Also posted 14 hours ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40835727

By @pasabagi - 4 months
Eh, the per-capita housing situation in the UK is 1 house per three people, per gov.uk statistics[0]. A third of a house is plenty for most people. The problem is that these houses are very unevenly distributed, so a large majority are under-inhabited, then a minority are packed to the gills. Building more houses will not solve this - it will just result in yet more empty houses that most people can't afford to live in.

[0]: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/net-supply-of-hous...