July 1st, 2024

Can a law make social media less 'addictive'?

New York passed laws to protect children on social media: SAFE for Kids Act requires parental consent for addictive feeds and limits notifications; Child Data Protection Act restricts data collection. Debate ensues over enforceability and unintended consequences.

Read original articleLink Icon
Can a law make social media less 'addictive'?

New York recently passed two laws aimed at protecting children from the potential harms of social media. The Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act requires parental consent for children under 18 to use apps with "addictive feeds" and limits notifications during certain hours. The New York Child Data Protection Act restricts the data collected by app providers. While some experts welcome these laws, others question their enforceability and potential unintended consequences. Concerns have been raised about the lack of clear scientific evidence linking social media to mental health issues and the potential for these laws to hinder addressing more pressing online dangers like child sexual abuse material and misinformation. Social media platforms have mixed responses to the legislation, with some industry bodies criticizing it as heavy-handed and unconstitutional. The debate continues on whether these laws will effectively address the complex issues surrounding children's use of social media or if a more comprehensive federal approach is needed.

Related

EU cancels vote on private chat app law amid encryption concerns

EU cancels vote on private chat app law amid encryption concerns

The European Union cancels vote on law targeting child sexual abuse material over encryption concerns. Proposed measures involve scanning images on messaging apps, sparking privacy debates among member states. Negotiations ongoing.

Los Angeles Unified School District will ban cellphones from school day in 2025

Los Angeles Unified School District will ban cellphones from school day in 2025

The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) plans to ban student cellphone and social media use during school hours from 2025 to address technology's impact on youth mental health. The decision aligns with statewide efforts to reduce distractions and conflicts in schools. Input from various stakeholders will shape the policy, with concerns raised about enforcement and effectiveness. Some schools report positive outcomes from similar bans, enhancing student engagement and social interactions. LAUSD aims to cater to diverse student needs, including those with disabilities.

New York governor signs bill regulating social media algorithms, in a US first

New York governor signs bill regulating social media algorithms, in a US first

New York Governor signs laws regulating social media algorithms and children's data. Legislation targets addictive features in apps, mandates chronological content for under 18, limits late-night notifications. Debate over First Amendment rights.

California's Gov. Newsom wants to restrict smartphone usage in schools – AP News

California's Gov. Newsom wants to restrict smartphone usage in schools – AP News

California Governor Gavin Newsom plans to limit smartphone use in schools to address mental health concerns linked to social media. This aligns with a national debate, including Surgeon General's call for warning labels. Local control and regulations are advocated.

Schools Can Help End the Phone-Based Childhood

Schools Can Help End the Phone-Based Childhood

Schools address phone overuse by implementing phone-free policies, collaborating with peers, and involving parents. Initiatives like the "Wait Past 8th Pledge" aim to promote healthier tech habits and benefit students.

Link Icon 7 comments
By @yipbub - 4 months
I wonder how many people talking about self-control have a good relationship with their phone? I don't know anyone personally who likes their relationship with their phone.

I've been considering and trying to practice being kinder to myself, my phone, and my relationship with it. I still want to use less of it, but it's now a part of us, and will take time to almost amputate. I want to just stop feeding it, and let it die off slowly, peacefully instead of amputating it with a hacksaw.

Any kind of self-control based on shame seems doomed to be a vicious cycle.

By @beardyw - 4 months
Parents seem to get out of this scot free. I see young children who's behaviour is ignored for long periods of time while parents are "busy" on their phones. The idea of parents being responsible for the upbringing of their children seems to be something which has disappeared.
By @55555 - 4 months
I think companies should be forced to provide a chat-only version of their app that's totally equivalent otherwise. How many of you only have instagram installed because you use it to talk with friends, but then sleepwalk into the algorithmic feed/explore page until you suddenly regain consciousness and notice you're wasting your life... The solution is easy: make a chat-only version mandatory.

I also think companies should be required to provide tools to strictly control what gets recommended to you. Social media companies think people "like" stuff if they engage with it, but that's only half the story. Those who are struggling with porn addiction or gambling addiction etc need a way to opt-out from any softcore thirst trap content or slots videos, etc.

By @dotcoma - 4 months
Can a law make cigarettes less addictive? What about alcoholic beverages? Soda? Sugar? Sweet stuff in general? Gambling? Drugs?

Possibly so, to a certain extent, but in the end it's our personal responsibility to stay as much away as possible from the above things.

By @iraldir - 4 months
I'd personally target the "source" of the addictiveness: outlaw behavioral analytics that, on those apps, analyse any detail of your navigation (how fast you scroll, where you stop etc.).

A: Many people are not aware that's a thing: "I did not click like on a racist video, but it keeps showing them to me", when in reality, the algorithm detected that you slowed down when shown that type of content so decided to feed more of it to you.

B: I targets your worse instinct (oh a half naked girl, maybe she has something interesting to say?), and if you're not aware of point A, it's a loosing battle. If you are aware of point A, it's constantly tiring to have to adjust you speed scroll etc.

I would personally make a GDPR type law that would require: "Any feed of user data must be presented in a non-opaque way, such as chronological, ranked by upvotes etc. Any personalized feed based on expectations of user preference should be entirely transparent, by allowing the user to access, modify their profile, as well as locking them (preventing future behaviour from changing the type of content you see).

By @drewcoo - 4 months
Can the BBC make questions less stupid?