New Web Development: Or, why Copilots and chatbots are bad for modern web dev
The analysis critiques Copilots, chatbots, and React for web development, citing slow sites, complex code, and high costs. It advocates for a shift to browser APIs, CSS, and HTML for better performance and lower expenses. Transition challenges include finding developers skilled in vanilla JavaScript. Organizations are urged to prioritize simplicity, efficiency, and core web technology training.
Read original article
In a critical analysis of modern web development, concerns are raised about the drawbacks of using Copilots, chatbots, and frameworks like React for Single-Page-App development. The article highlights issues such as slow and fragile sites, complex codebases, poor performance on low-end devices, and high maintenance costs associated with these technologies. It suggests a paradigm shift in web development towards utilizing built-in browser APIs and focusing on fundamentals like CSS and HTML. The shift aims to improve performance, productivity, and accessibility while reducing costs in the long term. Despite the benefits of transitioning away from frameworks like React, challenges arise in finding developers with expertise in vanilla JavaScript and fundamental web technologies due to the industry's heavy reliance on specific frameworks. The article emphasizes the need for organizations to reevaluate their approach to web development, prioritize simplicity and efficiency, and invest in training developers in core web technologies to adapt to the evolving landscape effectively.
Related
The demise of the mildly dynamic website (2022)
The evolution of websites from hand-crafted HTML to PHP enabled dynamic web apps with simple deployment. PHP's decline led to static site generators replacing mildly dynamic sites, shifting to JavaScript for features like comments.
Exposition of Front End Build Systems
Frontend build systems are crucial in web development, involving transpilation, bundling, and minification steps. Tools like Babel and Webpack optimize code for performance and developer experience. Various bundlers like Webpack, Rollup, Parcel, esbuild, and Turbopack are compared for features and performance.
The software world is destroying itself (2018)
The software development industry faces sustainability challenges like application size growth and performance issues. Emphasizing efficient coding, it urges reevaluation of practices for quality improvement and environmental impact reduction.
It's not just you, Next.js is getting harder to use
Next.js 13 introduces App Router with Server Components and enhanced caching, but users face challenges in utilizing features like Layouts and cookies. The shift to a more complex framework raises debates on balancing functionality and user-friendliness.
2 commentsRelated
The demise of the mildly dynamic website (2022)
The evolution of websites from hand-crafted HTML to PHP enabled dynamic web apps with simple deployment. PHP's decline led to static site generators replacing mildly dynamic sites, shifting to JavaScript for features like comments.
Exposition of Front End Build Systems
Frontend build systems are crucial in web development, involving transpilation, bundling, and minification steps. Tools like Babel and Webpack optimize code for performance and developer experience. Various bundlers like Webpack, Rollup, Parcel, esbuild, and Turbopack are compared for features and performance.
The software world is destroying itself (2018)
The software development industry faces sustainability challenges like application size growth and performance issues. Emphasizing efficient coding, it urges reevaluation of practices for quality improvement and environmental impact reduction.
It's not just you, Next.js is getting harder to use
Next.js 13 introduces App Router with Server Components and enhanced caching, but users face challenges in utilizing features like Layouts and cookies. The shift to a more complex framework raises debates on balancing functionality and user-friendliness.