July 6th, 2024

Nassim Nicholas Taleb: IQ is largely a pseudoscientific swindle

Nassim Nicholas Taleb criticizes IQ as flawed, capturing extreme unintelligence and test-taking skills, not true intelligence. He questions its use in profiling countries and predicting success, advocating for a broader view of mental abilities.

Read original articleLink Icon
Nassim Nicholas Taleb: IQ is largely a pseudoscientific swindle

Nassim Nicholas Taleb argues that IQ is a flawed measure, primarily capturing extreme unintelligence and test-taking skills rather than true intelligence. He criticizes the use of IQ in profiling countries and highlights the limited informational value of correlations in IQ testing. Taleb challenges the notion that IQ correlates with real-world success, pointing out the circularity in measuring achievements like wealth. He emphasizes the statistical flaws in IQ testing, questioning its validity as a scientific measure. Taleb suggests that IQ fails to predict performance in diverse real-world tasks and criticizes the overestimation of IQ's significance. He concludes that IQ is an immoral measure that can unfairly categorize individuals and groups. Taleb's critique extends to the limitations of IQ in predicting future needs and adapting to different environments. He warns against the reliance on IQ as a measure of intelligence and advocates for a more nuanced understanding of mental abilities beyond standardized testing.

Related

Uniquely human intelligence arose from expanded information capacity

Uniquely human intelligence arose from expanded information capacity

Human intelligence's evolution is linked to enhanced information processing capacity, not specific biases. Genetic enhancements in processing abilities across memory, attention, and learning systems differentiate human cognition, impacting functions like rule representation and abstract thinking. This perspective redefines human intelligence evolution.

People need this 'essential' cognitive ability–and fewer have it

People need this 'essential' cognitive ability–and fewer have it

Organizational psychologist Richard Davis warns about technology's impact on cognitive abilities, emphasizing the need for reducing phone usage and engaging in screen-free activities to maintain essential skills for personal and professional success.

Explainability is not a game

Explainability is not a game

Importance of explainability in machine learning for trustworthy AI decisions. Challenges with SHAP scores in providing rigorous explanations, potentially leading to errors. Emphasis on reliable explanations in critical domains like medical diagnosis.

'Superintelligence,' Ten Years On

'Superintelligence,' Ten Years On

Nick Bostrom's book "Superintelligence" from 2014 shaped the AI alignment debate, highlighting risks of artificial superintelligence surpassing human intellect. Concerns include misalignment with human values and skepticism about AI achieving sentience. Discussions emphasize safety in AI advancement.

AI's Cognitive Mirror: The Illusion of Consciousness in the Digital Age

AI's Cognitive Mirror: The Illusion of Consciousness in the Digital Age

The article explores AI's limitations in developing spiritual consciousness due to lacking sensory perception like humans. It discusses AI's strengths in abstract thought but warns of errors and biases. It touches on AI worship, language models, and the need for safeguards.

Link Icon 1 comments
By @Affric - 3 months
Well, it’s certainly invective against psychologists, people with learning difficulties, and IQ.

I think he grossly undervalues naive pattern recognition. Natural complex systems are emergent from very simple interactions with mind boggling numbers. I think the {1,2,3,4,x} example is demonstrative because he doesn’t suggest what the answer should be.

I agree with him that IQ is meaningless. I think his arguments are, ironically, somewhat reductive. A man from Lebanon’s privileged elite who has surely amassed fortune along with his fame during his lifetime places financial success as the most important metric. For others it could be how much “unproductive” time they have or propensity to be vegan or the number of offspring they produce or sporting success et cetera et cetera.

So sure, IQ is useless but I think the essay just tells us a lot more about him.