July 7th, 2024

Solving Concurrency Bugs Using Schedules and Imagination

Ankush Menat highlights challenges of concurrency bugs in business apps, stresses importance of addressing them. He introduces schedule diagrams as a visual debugging tool, offering a practical approach to identify and resolve concurrency issues efficiently. Menat demonstrates the effectiveness of schedule diagrams through examples, urging developers to leverage them for debugging.

Read original articleLink Icon
Solving Concurrency Bugs Using Schedules and Imagination

Ankush Menat discusses the challenges of dealing with concurrency bugs in business applications, emphasizing the importance of addressing these issues despite their rarity. He explains why traditional debugging methods are inefficient for concurrency bugs due to the complex nature of concurrent transactions. Menat introduces the concept of schedule diagrams as a tool to visualize and debug concurrency issues effectively. He outlines a practical approach to identifying transactions, constructing schedule diagrams, and testing hypotheses to resolve concurrency bugs. Through examples like debugging lost updates, stale cache issues, and double execution of exclusive operations, Menat demonstrates how schedule diagrams can help in understanding and resolving concurrency bugs. By leveraging imagination and careful analysis of transaction interleavings, developers can effectively tackle concurrency issues in their applications. Menat concludes by highlighting the utility of schedule diagrams in addressing various types of concurrency bugs and encourages developers to adopt this approach in their debugging processes.

Related

Misconceptions about loops in C

Misconceptions about loops in C

The paper emphasizes loop analysis in program tools, addressing challenges during transition to production. Late-discovered bugs stress the need for accurate analysis. Examples and references aid developers in improving software verification.

Weak isolation levels allowed to steal BTC using plain SQL

Weak isolation levels allowed to steal BTC using plain SQL

The article explores the trade-off between database isolation levels for data consistency and concurrency bugs. Weaker levels like "read committed" can lead to security risks and financial losses. Varying default levels impact performance.

Properly Testing Concurrent Data Structures

Properly Testing Concurrent Data Structures

The article explores testing concurrent data structures using the Rust library loom. It demonstrates creating property tests with managed threads to simulate concurrent behavior, emphasizing synchronization challenges and design considerations.

Synchronization Is Bad for Scale

Synchronization Is Bad for Scale

Challenges of synchronization in scaling distributed systems include lock contention issues, discouraging lock use in high-concurrency settings. Alternatives like sharding, consistent hashing, and the Saga Pattern are suggested for efficient synchronization. Examples from Mailgun's MongoDB use highlight strategies for avoiding lock contention and scaling effectively, cautioning against excessive database reliance for improved scalability.

Synchronization Is Bad for Scale

Synchronization Is Bad for Scale

Challenges of synchronization in scaling distributed systems are discussed, emphasizing issues with lock contention and proposing alternatives like sharding and consistent hashing. Mailgun's experiences highlight strategies to avoid synchronization bottlenecks.

Link Icon 5 comments
By @Groxx - 4 months
It's worth keeping in mind that updates that are not guarded by some kind of barrier are generally not guaranteed to be visible cross-thread / process / server / etc in the order you wrote them. And reorders are rather common in many languages / hardware types / storage systems / log collectors (including stdout because "do thing" and "log that you did it" are evidently not guarded together if there's a race happening), it's not just a theoretical concern.

Generally speaking though: yes, writing it down can help A LOT, and starting with what you can see is one of those obvious-in-retrospect things that are easily forgotten when under pressure. There are often a LOT of possibilities, and getting it out of your head so you can enumerate them more precisely can super duper important. Intuition for problematic sequences to check first will come with time.

By @SillyUsername - 4 months
Looks a lot like a derivate of a truth table, which is often used to debug multiple input combinations and expected output.
By @gamegoblin - 4 months
If you happen to be coding in Rust, for really robust concurrency testing, I cannot recommend enough the AWS Shuttle library (https://github.com/awslabs/shuttle) which can find insanely complicated race conditions.

What the Shuttle library is doing is basically automatically going through all the permutations of the schedule diagrams described int his blog post.

We used it at AWS to verify the custom filesystem we wrote to power AWS S3.

If you're curious, I wrote a little tutorial on it here: https://grantslatton.com/shuttle

By @rand03853 - 4 months
I insert debug macros with random usleep intervals in critical multithreaded code to expose race conditions. In production they ifdef to nothing.
By @ibash - 4 months
As someone who’s spent a lot of time with javascript, debugging concurrency issues is second nature.

No better training than a great spaghetti ball of promise chains.