July 8th, 2024

Dumb website only lets one user in at a time

A website by Michael Hoffman permits one user at a time, inspired by a prior site displaying online users. Its content is undisclosed until access, fostering intrigue. The site's code is accessible on Glitch.

Read original articleLink Icon
Dumb website only lets one user in at a time

This website created by Michael Hoffman allows only one person to access it at a time, while others have to wait their turn. The idea originated from a previous website showing the number of users online, prompting the creation of this unique concept. The site's content remains a mystery until a user gains access, encouraging curiosity and patience. The code for the website is available for viewing and remixing on Glitch.

Related

Link Icon 30 comments
By @bityard - 3 months
Not at all the same thing I admit, but the company I work for has a product that limits the number of transactions (per user) to 1. Where "transaction" is roughly equivalent to an HTTP request. So if you run a query that takes 30 seconds, get bored, open up a new tab to do something else in the product, your new tab will hang until the transaction in the previous tab has completed.

I hate it.

There is a special URL that will kill your running transaction. All of the engineers know it and have it bookmarked, but it's undocumented.

By @jusonchan81 - 3 months
You can see the page from the source code:

<article id="content" class="inside"> <h1> Congratulations </h1>

  <h2>
    Only you can see this website.
  </h2>
  
  <p id="suckers"></p><br/>

  <img class="trophy glow" src="https://cdn.glitch.global/1543e9b8-e528-46e7-9375-25300add0f54/trophy.gif?v=1646925832589" alt="clip art animated gleaming first place trophy"/>
<br/>

  <p>
    Don't leave or you'll lose your spot.
  </p><br/>

  <a id="tweet" href="#" target="_blank">
    <img class="icon twitter" src="img/twitter.svg" alt="Twitter icon" />
  </a>
</article>
By @aodonnell2536 - 3 months
Upon visiting the website:

  failed to start application on imherefor.me
  This is most likely because your project has a code error.
  Check your project logs, fix the error and try again

Maybe it got hugged to death?
By @barryrandall - 3 months
Take away the position counter, and this would perfectly simulate trying to use a single-line BBS.
By @mataug - 3 months
Spoiler for anyone interested https://imgur.com/U4XxbDZ
By @mkoryak - 3 months
I once worked for a Cambridge startup called Sayagle where you would Yagle for SayaCash (don't ask).

I started after the website was built by a cheap offshore team. It was built with JSF and we soon found that no one thought about multithreading because they only ever tested it with a single user.

Needless to say, when more than 10 users were active on the site, they would start to experience problems, like seeing eachothers data and stuff. "We" fixed the problem by adding more servers while I tried to rewrite the whole thing using spring and jsp.

By @fsniper - 3 months
I know this is meant to be a joke, but there are official sites in Ireland that really does use queues like this.
By @evanjrowley - 3 months
I'm tempted to create a version of this that launches a crypto miner while users are waiting.
By @dgrin91 - 3 months
The queue here seems to work poorly. Looked at the site and I was 162. Looked away and back for literally 2 seconds, I was 164. alt tab and back again, I was 176. Again and I was 188/188. Now I'm 140. What?
By @exsomet - 3 months
I pulled this up out of fun curiosity, and then found it harder than expected to close the site because “what if I lose my place?”. And so that’s basically how marketing works in a nutshell.

The human psyche is weird.

By @Zaheer - 3 months
There's a whole business for bad performing websites that need to limit visitors! https://queue-it.com/
By @zxilly - 3 months
Is this page down?I only got failed to start application on imherefor.me

  This is most likely because your project has a code error.
  Check your project logs, fix the error and try again.
By @breck - 3 months
"This is brilliant! The way all websites should be"

- Sincerely, the Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins, John Wiley & Sons and Penguin Random House

By @fitsumbelay - 3 months
1. this is an AWESOME art idea 2. even more awesome is the single comment to hoffm's first post about this site a few months ago (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30700024) and I hope HN keeps it that way
By @lovegrenoble - 3 months
Little toys like this are the spirit of the web, it must be included here: https://sharkle.com
By @emeraldd - 3 months
Anyone actually get into the size and see what's there?
By @jes5199 - 3 months
I've thought about doing this sort of thing, maybe a max number of visitors per day, for a blog, as an anti-going-viral measure
By @hecanjog - 3 months
Oh, bummer. I got down to flipping between position #2 and position #3, then the poll request returned 503 and I lost my spot.
By @hoffm - 3 months
Glad folks are enjoying this silly project! If you want to know more, I wrote something about it back when I made it:

https://hoffm.medium.com/hey-look-at-us-3a742993f5c

By @BrianHenryIE - 3 months
About 15 years ago, I knew an online store that was closed on Sundays.
By @booleandilemma - 3 months
I got stuck at number 8 for a long time and gave up.

What a funny idea!

By @anbardoi - 3 months
Should definitely add a chat function so people can yell at the guy taking forever
By @laomai - 3 months
Reminds of the old Gbbs days :-)
By @hammock - 3 months
So it's.. a book?
By @timeon - 3 months
Ok guys can you move? Someone is there for too long.
By @impure - 3 months
50 points and over 40 comments on Hacker News. I wouldn't call that dumb.
By @pedrogpimenta - 3 months
You're dumb.