July 10th, 2024

AI has created a 'fake it till you make it' bubble that could end in disaster

A market expert warns of AI hype likened to the dot-com bubble, citing concerns over inflated promises, questionable applications, and energy consumption. Caution advised for investors, with emphasis on traditional strategies.

Read original articleLink Icon
AI has created a 'fake it till you make it' bubble that could end in disaster

A veteran market watcher has raised concerns about the current hype surrounding artificial intelligence (AI), warning that the technology may be "effectively useless." James Ferguson from MacroStrategy Partnership believes that the AI market has created a bubble similar to the dot-com era, with exaggerated promises and questionable applications. He highlighted the issue of large language models inventing information and the high energy consumption of AI technologies as significant challenges. Ferguson cautioned investors, particularly those heavily involved in AI-related stocks like Nvidia, that the market may be overvalued and reminiscent of the dot-com crash. Despite the risks associated with the AI bubble bursting, Ferguson suggested that there is still value in U.S. small-cap stocks that are not as highly priced. He emphasized the importance of traditional investment strategies and cautioned against blindly following tech hype. Ferguson's insights serve as a reminder of the potential pitfalls in the current AI landscape and the importance of prudent investment decisions.

Related

Goldman Sachs says the return on investment for AI might be disappointing

Goldman Sachs says the return on investment for AI might be disappointing

Goldman Sachs warns of potential disappointment in over $1 trillion AI investments by tech firms. High costs, performance limitations, and uncertainties around future cost reductions pose challenges for AI adoption.

Nvidia and Microsoft leap frogged Apple

Nvidia and Microsoft leap frogged Apple

Microsoft and Nvidia outpace Apple in market value through AI focus. Concerns on AI sustainability due to energy use. Investors demand real AI results, caution grows. Industry's success tied to energy efficiency and results delivery. Apple trails in AI competition.

AI's $600B Question

AI's $600B Question

The AI industry's revenue growth and market dynamics reveal a significant gap between expectations and actual growth. Nvidia's milestone as the most valuable company prompts a reevaluation, highlighting a $600 billion challenge. Various factors like GPU supply, revenue distribution, and new technologies impact the industry's financial landscape. Speculative investment and pricing dynamics raise concerns, emphasizing a cautious approach to AI industry complexities.

AI industry needs to earn $600B per year to pay for hardware spend

AI industry needs to earn $600B per year to pay for hardware spend

The AI industry faces challenges to meet $600 billion annual revenue target to offset massive hardware investments. Concerns arise over profitability gap, urging companies to innovate and create value for sustainability.

AI 'useless,' creating a risky 'fake it till you make it' bubble

AI 'useless,' creating a risky 'fake it till you make it' bubble

Veteran market watcher James Ferguson warns about the AI market bubble, citing risks like false information creation and high energy consumption. He advises caution in investing in AI-related stocks, suggesting value in U.S. small-cap stocks post-bubble burst.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @kjellsbells - 3 months
Isnt the root that "AI" has come to be equated with "generative AI" in the public (and investor) mind? And since genAI shows great promise but is still in its early days, there is a rush to throw more at it in an attempt to stave off the collapse of the inflated expectations bubble.

The risk then is that genAI implodes and takes down all of the other AI disciplines with it.

Ultimately buyers pay for outcomes, and they are much more important than investors, who pay for the promise of buyers and therefore are susceptible to hype (Sequoia fawning over SBF being a juicy example). Therefore, as a seller, I would be drilling down into how my product solves a problem for the buyer, and not leading with how it gets there (AI). "Contract review in 60 seconds means you save $300 an hour on legal fees, and we have a $100M indemnity clause if we get it wrong" rather than "our AI model blah blah".

By @constantcrying - 3 months
I think many non technical people have an incorrect understanding of "AI", where they conflate a single example of what neural networks can do, namely chat bots, with an entire field.

Even if chat bots have no significant advances in the foreseeable future, "AI" as in large neural networks have already proven themselves to be extremely useful and able to accomplish a lot of things which are almost impossible to do without them.

By @Kuinox - 3 months
> “AI still remains, I would argue, completely unproven. And fake it till you make it may work in Silicon Valley, but for the rest of us, I think once bitten twice shy may be more appropriate for AI,” he said. “If AI cannot be trusted…then AI is effectively, in my mind, useless.”

This quote is enough to dismiss the whole article.