Why Doesn't Advice Work?
Advice can fail due to being bad, incomplete, or misunderstood. Lack of willpower or belief in its effectiveness can lead to ignoring advice. Seeking reassurance and guidance are common reasons. Easy-to-follow advice is crucial. Understanding advice dynamics is valuable for seekers and givers.
Read original articleThe article explores why advice often fails to produce the desired outcomes. It suggests that advice may be ineffective due to various reasons such as being bad, incomplete, or not understood by the recipient. People may also ignore advice if they lack the willpower to follow it or if they believe it won't work for them. Additionally, individuals may seek advice for reassurance, as a conversation starter, or as a form of "guardrail" to avoid catastrophic decisions. The piece highlights the challenges of giving and receiving advice, emphasizing the importance of realistic expectations and focusing on advice that is easy to follow. It also touches on the idea that advice related to spending money tends to be more appealing and actionable to people. Ultimately, the article suggests that understanding why advice often goes unheeded may not lead to clear solutions but offers insights for both advice seekers and providers.
Related
Clear Thinking – Insights from one of the best books on decision-making
The article summarizes insights from Shane Parrish's book on decision-making, highlighting the impact of human nature on judgment. It discusses common defaults hindering clear thinking and suggests a structured approach to improve decision-making skills.
The case against morning yoga, daily routines, and endless meetings
The article challenges rigid routines for success, promoting dynamic, high-impact "10x work" that requires agency and seizing opportunities. It emphasizes risk-taking, seeking valuable tasks, and continuous learning for exceptional career outcomes.
You see, Jim is an economist.
When he gets a piece of advice, he thinks about game theory. He recognizes there is information asymmetry between the advisor and the advisee. He thinks about whether your incentives are aligned. He thinks about whether there's any cost in producing the advice, vs following it. He thinks about further-round effects of you potentially becoming dependent on the advisor for future decisions, and the principal-agent perspectives in that relationship.
Jim is a dismal character.
Isn't this mythology? Trying to get a rational explanation for actors' actions feels moot, since they are programmed that way by the author of the story.
A better example is here: https://youtu.be/DBrAlKilXqM?t=74
If, you knew for certain, that Problem X is solvable with Effort Y with enough of Resource Z - would you act upon the advice?
If anyone has given advice that was not heeded it can be frustrating. All the advice and information exists to solve your problem yet if it remains - why?
Losing weight is an example of a known problem with a solution. People do the equation - the Effort Y is often variable that is lacking because the Effort is 18 hours of consistent, positive behavior, for weeks or months in a row.
Once you accept this, you must figure out which a person is and adjust how to give advice. You can straight up ask, but that makes for boringness. Then you approach it with positivity and excitement; speaking in regards to that person's wants.
You'll be shocked what kind of happens around you in the periphery afterwards. A positive and negative reaction occurs, you might call it karma or what comes around goes around. Playing with advice can be dangerous, which is why it's a hostile thing for some cultures.
An example is wanting someone to read a book you think they'll like. It costs you nothing to give this advice. If anything, you stand to gain in something like reputation or ego if it's helpful or something they enjoy. But it potentially costs time they they might've spent enjoying something else even more.
one time i gave a friend some advice and he did the exact opposite. oh, the satisfaction! xD
I'm glad someone else noticed this.
If F=ma, then the "money" coupled with the "advice" characterizes the amount of force delivered.
Money here covers the spectrum of incentives from cash to sex to perks.
The wiser one is, the more prone to hoovering up good advice one likely is, and the less "m" is needed.
yeah, and a lot of advice is "forgot shampoo? divorce!"
Related
Clear Thinking – Insights from one of the best books on decision-making
The article summarizes insights from Shane Parrish's book on decision-making, highlighting the impact of human nature on judgment. It discusses common defaults hindering clear thinking and suggests a structured approach to improve decision-making skills.
The case against morning yoga, daily routines, and endless meetings
The article challenges rigid routines for success, promoting dynamic, high-impact "10x work" that requires agency and seizing opportunities. It emphasizes risk-taking, seeking valuable tasks, and continuous learning for exceptional career outcomes.