Bitwarden (the SDK and mobile app) is not FOSS
Bitwarden password manager faces licensing challenges due to its non-FOSS SDK, limiting its availability on platforms like F-Droid. Community forums discuss implications and hurdles for FOSS compatibility.
Read original article
The Bitwarden password manager is not considered Free and Open-Source Software (FOSS) due to its SDK using a proprietary license, as highlighted on the Bitwarden Community Forums. This licensing issue has led to Bitwarden not being included in platforms like F-Droid, as it does not meet the criteria for FOSS compatibility. Attempts to compile the package for inclusion in the F-Droid repository have been hindered by this licensing limitation. The discussion on the forums also references specific URLs pointing to the non-FOSS nature of the Bitwarden SDK. Despite being a popular password manager, Bitwarden's non-FOSS status has implications for its availability on certain platforms. The community forums provide insights into the licensing challenges faced by Bitwarden, impacting its accessibility for users seeking FOSS solutions.
Related
Windows: Insecure by Design
Ongoing security issues in Microsoft Windows include vulnerabilities like CVE-2024-30080 and CVE-2024-30078, criticized for potential remote code execution. Concerns raised about privacy with Recall feature, Windows 11 setup, and OneDrive integration. Advocacy for Linux desktops due to security and privacy frustrations.
Open source is neither a community nor a democracy
Open source software thrives on meritocracy, not democracy. Core contributors drive projects forward, emphasizing collaboration and freedom under the license. Users' influence aligns with their contributions, fostering a gift exchange culture.
A Git story: Not so fun this time
Linus Torvalds faced challenges managing Linux kernel growth, leading to BitKeeper's development by Larry McVoy. Free BitKeeper use sparked mixed reactions, prompting Andrew Tridgell to create an open-source client in 2005, offering alternatives.
Free and Open Source Software–and Other Market Failures
The article explores the evolution and impact of free and open-source software (FOSS) in computing, emphasizing its response to market failures and monopolistic practices. It discusses FOSS history, benefits, challenges, and role in promoting innovation.
Scorecard: Assess Open Source Project Security
The OpenSSF Scorecard assesses open source projects for security risks using automated checks. It offers scores, risk levels, and remediation prompts to strengthen development practices, aiming to improve open source software security.
2 commentsRelated
Windows: Insecure by Design
Ongoing security issues in Microsoft Windows include vulnerabilities like CVE-2024-30080 and CVE-2024-30078, criticized for potential remote code execution. Concerns raised about privacy with Recall feature, Windows 11 setup, and OneDrive integration. Advocacy for Linux desktops due to security and privacy frustrations.
Open source is neither a community nor a democracy
Open source software thrives on meritocracy, not democracy. Core contributors drive projects forward, emphasizing collaboration and freedom under the license. Users' influence aligns with their contributions, fostering a gift exchange culture.
A Git story: Not so fun this time
Linus Torvalds faced challenges managing Linux kernel growth, leading to BitKeeper's development by Larry McVoy. Free BitKeeper use sparked mixed reactions, prompting Andrew Tridgell to create an open-source client in 2005, offering alternatives.
Free and Open Source Software–and Other Market Failures
The article explores the evolution and impact of free and open-source software (FOSS) in computing, emphasizing its response to market failures and monopolistic practices. It discusses FOSS history, benefits, challenges, and role in promoting innovation.
Scorecard: Assess Open Source Project Security
The OpenSSF Scorecard assesses open source projects for security risks using automated checks. It offers scores, risk levels, and remediation prompts to strengthen development practices, aiming to improve open source software security.