Federal Ban on Home-Distilling Exceeds Congress' Enumerated Powers
A federal court in Texas ruled against federal laws banning home-distilling, stating they exceed Congress' powers. The decision emphasizes limitations on taxing and commerce powers, stressing laws must align with constitutional boundaries.
Read original article
A federal district court in Texas ruled in Hobby Distillers Association v. Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau that federal laws banning home-distilling of spirits plants exceed Congress' enumerated powers. The court found that these prohibitions surpassed the federal taxing power and the Interstate Commerce Clause, along with the Necessary and Proper Clause. The court issued a permanent injunction against enforcing these laws on certain plaintiffs. The case, represented by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, challenges the broad use of federal power post-NFIB. The decision delves into the limitations of Congress's taxing power and the necessity for regulations to be connected to revenue protection. It also discusses the constraints on Congress's reach under the Commerce Clause, emphasizing that regulations must serve a comprehensive statutory scheme to be constitutionally valid. The ruling highlights the importance of ensuring that laws are directly related to the powers granted to Congress and do not overstep constitutional boundaries.
Related
Supreme Court limits use of SEC in-house tribunals
The Supreme Court ruled against SEC's use of internal tribunals in fraud cases, citing constitutional violations. Experts predict fewer enforcement actions due to required jury trials, impacting federal agencies' power and regulatory authority.
Federal judge partially blocks U.S. ban on noncompetes
A federal judge in Texas partially blocks the U.S. government's ban on noncompete agreements, citing harm to businesses. The ruling delays the ban's enforcement for plaintiffs, questioning the FTC's authority. Noncompete debate continues between job flexibility advocates and confidentiality protection supporters.
Federal judge partially blocks U.S. ban on noncompetes
A federal judge in Texas partially blocked the U.S. government's ban on noncompete agreements, citing plaintiffs' likelihood of success and public interest. The FTC's ban aimed to enhance job mobility and competition.
Judge says FTC lacks authority to issue rule banning noncompete agreements
A Texas judge ruled FTC lacks authority to ban noncompete agreements, casting doubt on enforcement. Lawsuit questions FTC's rulemaking power. Final ruling expected by August 30, impacting enforcement on September 4.
What the Supreme Court's Nix on the Chevron doctrine means for food regulation
The Supreme Court's decision to strike down the Chevron doctrine impacts food regulation, allowing businesses to challenge agency regulations. Concerns arise over risks to food safety, nutrition, and environmental protections, hindering regulatory development.
1 commentsRelated
Supreme Court limits use of SEC in-house tribunals
The Supreme Court ruled against SEC's use of internal tribunals in fraud cases, citing constitutional violations. Experts predict fewer enforcement actions due to required jury trials, impacting federal agencies' power and regulatory authority.
Federal judge partially blocks U.S. ban on noncompetes
A federal judge in Texas partially blocks the U.S. government's ban on noncompete agreements, citing harm to businesses. The ruling delays the ban's enforcement for plaintiffs, questioning the FTC's authority. Noncompete debate continues between job flexibility advocates and confidentiality protection supporters.
Federal judge partially blocks U.S. ban on noncompetes
A federal judge in Texas partially blocked the U.S. government's ban on noncompete agreements, citing plaintiffs' likelihood of success and public interest. The FTC's ban aimed to enhance job mobility and competition.
Judge says FTC lacks authority to issue rule banning noncompete agreements
A Texas judge ruled FTC lacks authority to ban noncompete agreements, casting doubt on enforcement. Lawsuit questions FTC's rulemaking power. Final ruling expected by August 30, impacting enforcement on September 4.
What the Supreme Court's Nix on the Chevron doctrine means for food regulation
The Supreme Court's decision to strike down the Chevron doctrine impacts food regulation, allowing businesses to challenge agency regulations. Concerns arise over risks to food safety, nutrition, and environmental protections, hindering regulatory development.