July 12th, 2024

Born into slavery, he rose to the top of France's art world

A new exhibition in the U.S. and the Louvre highlights Guillaume Lethière's life as a prominent artist born into slavery. His journey, artworks, abolitionist beliefs, and impact are showcased comprehensively.

Read original articleLink Icon
Born into slavery, he rose to the top of France's art world

A new exhibition in the U.S. and later at the Louvre in Paris showcases the life and works of Guillaume Lethière, a prominent artist born into slavery in Guadeloupe in 1760. Despite his mixed-race origins, Lethière rose to fame in France during a tumultuous historical period, navigating through the French Revolution, Napoleon's reign, and political complexities. The exhibition, curated by Esther Bell, sheds light on Lethière's journey, from his training as an artist in Rouen to becoming the director of the French Academy in Rome. His artworks, including portraits and historical scenes, reflect his abolitionist beliefs and connections to powerful figures like Napoleon's family. Lethière's legacy extends to Haiti, where he sent a significant painting symbolizing unity and independence. The exhibition at the Clark Art Institute delves into Lethière's life, his artistic evolution, and his enduring impact on art and history, offering a comprehensive view of his remarkable inheritance.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @vidarh - 4 months
It mentions Dumas held a eulogy for him. Dumas father came from a similar family background: He was the son of a French nobleman and a Caribbean slave, and Dumas' grandfather bought his father free and brought him to France, where he ended up a general under Napoleon.
By @rob74 - 4 months
By @ralferoo - 4 months
> “Le Thière” is French for “the third”

Is this true? I know modern French is troisième, but I'd never seen this before, so I googled. There seems to be nothing on the internet about it, and remarkably few matches for Thière beyond misspellings of théière (teapot), which makes me think the authors of this article just made this up.

By @asveikau - 4 months
I like the photorealism in some of these images. They look somewhat like contemporary people even though it's more than 200 years ago.
By @rurban - 4 months
You wouldn't be interested in him as neoclassicist, academist, even professor at Beaux Arts today, because that period is totally uninteresting at all. If not how they suppressed the independent artists, romantics those days. In England or Germany much more interesting painters were celebrated those days, who won over those salon academics.
By @hn_throwaway_99 - 4 months
The Wikipedia page for him, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillaume_Guillon-Lethi%C3%A8r..., states that he was not born into slavery, but instead:

> He was born out of wedlock, to Marie-Françoise Dupepaye, a free person of color, and Pierre Guillon, a colonial Royal Notary.

The source for that sentence states his mother was "une esclave affranchie noire" - a freed black slave.

May seem like a small detail, and I'm not sure the Wikipedia page is correct, but I think it's worth correcting the reporting if it is.