July 12th, 2024

Dead Internet Theory

The Dead Internet theory suggests online content is mostly generated by bots, potentially manipulating users. Proponents cite increased bot traffic, while critics like Caroline Busta dismiss it as a "paranoid fantasy." The theory originated in online forums and has gained attention among tech enthusiasts.

Read original articleLink Icon
Dead Internet Theory

The Dead Internet theory is an online conspiracy suggesting that the majority of online content is generated by bots and algorithms, reducing organic human activity and potentially manipulating the population. Proponents claim these bots were intentionally created to influence algorithms and search results. While some believe government agencies are involved, the theory lacks full support in literature. The theory has gained attention due to quantifiable phenomena like increased bot traffic. However, critics like Caroline Busta consider it a "paranoid fantasy" with legitimate concerns about bot activity. The theory originated from online forums and has spread to discussions among technology enthusiasts and researchers. It highlights the displacement of human-generated content by bots and the alleged manipulation of the population by various actors. Evidence includes the rise of large language models like ChatGPT and reports on bot traffic. Instances on platforms like Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, TikTok, and YouTube have been cited as examples supporting the theory. The theory has been discussed on social media platforms and covered by various YouTube channels, contributing to its mainstream visibility.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @8organicbits - 5 months
I think the major search engines guide us towards the dead parts of the Internet. It's unsurprising that Google (an ad agency) sends traffic to the ad-laden, dead parts of the web. Living parts of the web tend not to like ads (they are user hostile) while the dead parts are just trying to drive clicks.

But the web is still alive, see:

* https://www.marginalia.nu/

* https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2024/04/16/the-dark-forest-anthol...

* https://alexsci.com/rss-blogroll-network/

By @ChrisArchitect - 4 months
See the many discussions about AI-infiltration and "Dead Internet Theory" around here:

The AI bullshit singularity

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39422528

The internet feels fake now. It's all just staged videos and marketing

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39551035

X becoming a 'ghost town' of bots as AI-generated spam content floods internet

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39535310

The Internet Is Full of AI Dogshit

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38952526

By @rossdavidh - 5 months
So, there are three parts to this:

1) that most of the internet is now "inorganic", i.e. fake generated content. This seems to be nearly an objective fact by now.

2) that most of the inorganic content is created in order to manipulate the public; well sure, why else?

3) that it's mostly done by ONE organization, e.g. the U.S. government. That seems implausible, for many reasons. It's a whole host of organizations (governments, corporations, political movements) all trying to spam the world (with machine-generated content) in order to sway opinions.

So, I agree with every part of this "conspiracy theory", except for the conspiracy part. This is my objection to most conspiracy theories; it's not that I don't believe the big powers do bad stuff, it's that I don't believe they're all on the same side or that well organized.