July 12th, 2024

The "Horgan Surface" and "The Death of Proof"

John Horgan's namesake "Horgan surface" in mathematics sparked debate on proofs and technology's role. Despite controversy, he reflects on evolving math and the impact of computerization on human discovery.

Read original articleLink Icon
The "Horgan Surface" and "The Death of Proof"

John Horgan, a science writer, discusses the concept of the "Horgan surface" in mathematics, which was named after him in a somewhat derogatory manner. The surface was initially thought to contradict the idea that computer modeling could replace traditional proofs. However, mathematician Matthias Weber later provided a nonexistence proof for the "Horgan surface." Despite the controversy surrounding his work, Horgan remains proud of the recognition, even if it was sarcastic. The discussion on the evolving nature of mathematics, the role of proofs, and the impact of technology like computers and artificial intelligence on the field continues to be relevant. Horgan reflects on the ongoing developments in mathematics, including the discovery of new mathematical objects like the Horgan surfaces, both real and pseudo. The debate around the mechanization of mathematics and the implications for human understanding and discovery remains a topic of interest in the field.

Related

Rosser's Theorem via Turing Machines (2011)

Rosser's Theorem via Turing Machines (2011)

The post delves into Rosser's Theorem, a potent extension of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems, showcasing self-reference in formal systems. It elucidates Rosser's stronger disproof concept and its impact on system consistency. Additionally, it links Rosser's Theorem to the halting problem's unsolvability, underlining computational insights and Gödel's lasting influence on computability theory.

Why do we still teach people to calculate?

Why do we still teach people to calculate?

Conrad Wolfram promotes modernizing math education by integrating computers, problem-solving emphasis, and adapting to technological advancements. His innovative approach challenges traditional methods to better prepare students for real-world challenges.

Synthesizer for Thought

Synthesizer for Thought

The article delves into synthesizers evolving as tools for music creation through mathematical understanding of sound, enabling new genres. It explores interfaces for music interaction and proposes innovative language models for text analysis and concept representation, aiming to enhance creative processes.

Ensemble Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

Ensemble Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

The Mathematical Universe Hypothesis (MUH) posits the universe as a mathematical entity, facing critiques on assigning probabilities to infinite structures and conflicts with Gödel's theorem. Tegmark defends MUH's computability and links it to multiverse theories, amid debates on testability and radical Platonism.

The Zombie Misconception of Theoretical Computer Science

The Zombie Misconception of Theoretical Computer Science

The blog post delves into misconceptions in theoretical computer science, focusing on computability and complexity theory. It clarifies the distinction between functions and questions, NP-hard problems, and the P versus NP dilemma. Emphasizing the importance of grasping fundamental principles, the author seeks reader input on combating these misunderstandings.

Link Icon 0 comments