July 13th, 2024

An insect is sitting in your compiler and doesn't want to leave for 13 years

An insect in a compiler caused encoding issues for 13 years, leading to build failures and ODR violations. Despite bug reports and patches, the problem persists, highlighting the need for timely fixes.

Read original articleLink Icon
An insect is sitting in your compiler and doesn't want to leave for 13 years

An insect has been causing trouble in a compiler for 13 years, leading to unexpected issues when encoding files. The story highlights a scenario where a simple encoding change caused a cascade of problems, including build failures and ODR violations. The root cause was traced back to a header file encoding change, showcasing the complexities of compiler behavior. The article discusses the challenges with pragma directives, especially in GCC, and the potential pitfalls when dealing with different encodings and third-party libraries. Despite efforts to address the issue, including a reported bug and patch, the problem persists after several years. The narrative emphasizes the importance of timely bug fixes and user support in software development. The author suggests that it's time for GCC to address longstanding issues to enhance user experience and avoid such incidents in the future.

Related

How GCC and Clang handle statically known undefined behaviour

How GCC and Clang handle statically known undefined behaviour

Discussion on compilers handling statically known undefined behavior (UB) in C code reveals insights into optimizations. Compilers like gcc and clang optimize based on undefined language semantics, potentially crashing programs or ignoring problematic code. UB avoidance is crucial for program predictability and security. Compilers differ in handling UB, with gcc and clang showing variations in crash behavior and warnings. LLVM's 'poison' values allow optimizations despite UB, reflecting diverse compiler approaches. Compiler responses to UB are subjective, influenced by developers and user requirements.

Mix-testing: revealing a new class of compiler bugs

Mix-testing: revealing a new class of compiler bugs

A new "mix testing" approach uncovers compiler bugs by compiling test fragments with different compilers. Examples show issues in x86 and Arm architectures, emphasizing the importance of maintaining instruction ordering. Luke Geeson developed a tool to explore compiler combinations, identifying bugs and highlighting the need for clearer guidelines.

The weirdest QNX bug I've ever encountered

The weirdest QNX bug I've ever encountered

The author encountered a CPU usage bug in a QNX system's 'ps' utility due to a 15-year-old bug. Debugging revealed a race condition, leading to code modifications and a shift towards open-source solutions.

Refined Input, Degraded Output: The Counterintuitive World of Compiler Behavior

Refined Input, Degraded Output: The Counterintuitive World of Compiler Behavior

The study delves into compiler behavior when given extra information for program optimization. Surprisingly, more data can sometimes lead to poorer optimization due to intricate compiler interactions. Testing identified 59 cases in popular compilers, emphasizing the need for better understanding.

Boosting Compiler Testing by Injecting Real-World Code

Boosting Compiler Testing by Injecting Real-World Code

The research introduces a method to enhance compiler testing by using real-world code snippets to create diverse test programs. The approach, implemented in the Creal tool, identified and reported 132 bugs in GCC and LLVM, contributing to compiler testing practices.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @gryfft - 3 months
First time I've seen a computer bug referred to as an "insect."

Sucks that this compiler bug is still around after all this time. Seems like a adding a pre-commit hook to the project to enforce correct encoding would be a simple workaround, though.