July 18th, 2024

NASA Spent $450M on a Moon Rover. Now It's Canceling the Mission

NASA cancels $450 million VIPER mission to moon's south pole due to delays and budget concerns. Rover replaced with nonfunctional simulator. Components may be repurposed for future missions.

Read original articleLink Icon
BudgetSkepticismPolitics
NASA Spent $450M on a Moon Rover. Now It's Canceling the Mission

NASA has decided to cancel the VIPER mission, a $450 million project aimed at sending a robotic rover to search for water ice near the moon's south pole. The cancellation was due to delays and concerns about future budgets, leading to the disassembly of the rover and its replacement with a nonfunctional "mass simulator." The mission was intended to provide crucial information for future lunar exploration but faced uncertainties due to delays in both the VIPER rover and the spacecraft meant to land it on the moon. NASA officials highlighted the difficulty of the decision, emphasizing the need to prioritize missions within budget constraints. Despite the cancellation, NASA plans to repurpose VIPER's components for other missions and is open to proposals from American companies or international partners to utilize the system. The cancellation reflects NASA's efforts to manage costs and prioritize missions in a constrained budget environment, with potential implications for other lunar exploration endeavors.

AI: What people are saying
The cancellation of NASA's $450 million VIPER mission to the moon's south pole has sparked various reactions.
  • Some question why NASA doesn't send the already-built rover instead of a nonfunctional simulator, suggesting it could be worth the risk.
  • Others argue that NASA is avoiding the sunk cost fallacy, implying that further investment in the mission is not justified.
  • There are concerns about the broader implications of budget cuts on NASA's science programs and future missions.
  • Some comments reflect skepticism about the rover's functionality, suggesting it might not work and that sending it could expose its flaws.
  • Political and socio-economic factors are also discussed, with some predicting changes in NASA's direction under future administrations.
Link Icon 13 comments
By @jefftk - 5 months
> A nonfunctional “mass simulator” will take its place. ... NASA had spent $450 million on VIPER, which is already fully assembled with its science instruments installed ... testing of the rover to make sure it would survive the shaking of a rocket launch and the harsh conditions of space has not been completed. The cancellation would save at least $84 million, as NASA would no longer need to pay to complete the tests or to operate the rover on the moon ... The agency is still planning to pay Astrobotic $323 million to [take the mass simulator to the moon].

If you've already built the rover and are paying to transport it to the moon regardless, why not skip the testing and send the rover instead of a "mass simulator"? Then if it works you have a functional rover on the moon and paying to operate it is worth it, and if it doesn't work then it's the same as if you sent something non-functional on purpose.

By @scarab92 - 5 months
NASA understands sunk cost fallacy.

NYT doesn’t.

By @diggernet - 5 months
By @damiankennedy - 5 months
Another article here with video: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/techandscience/nasa-cancels-4...

"First and most important, this is in no way a reflection on the quality of the work from the mission team that are working to build this rover," said Nicola Fox, associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate. "They have worked diligently, including through the pandemic, to be able to build this rover to look for water on the moon."

...

"Funding for the agency's science programs as a whole was reduced by $1 billion for 2025, Fox said today."

By @dev1ycan - 5 months
Bad idea, I'm not a republican or anything but if there's something republicans love to do is to brag about "size", China is about to start literally blossoming in key areas.

Be it: Semiconductors, green energy (just hit its 2030 targets 6 years earlier), space (just built a space station and plans for a moon base aren't that far away).

I can totally see an eventual trump presidency pouring money into NASA's budget just for bragging rights, seems very weird to cancel the mission before the elections (Plus it benefits trump lobbyists)

By @rqtwteye - 5 months
After watching this video i have serious doubts about the whole moon program https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OoJsPvmFixU

Reminds me a little of the SLS which makes no sense at all other than preserving some jobs. The Space Shuttle was also ruined by military requirements that never materialized.

By @_heimdall - 5 months
Edit: Massive brain fart here. I can't do msth today. Leaving this comment here for posterity, but please move along. I can't do math here.

Its sad that $450M seems like a drop in the bucket when it comes to government spending today.

When I was born in 1988 the US had $2.6T in total debt. That number is already insane, but in this case $450M would be around 17% of the total debt accrued over 212 years.

Today we spend a few trillion more than we have every year. When do we collectively wake up and realize it's either or scam or a joke?

Note: I'm ignoring inflation adjusted values here because I'm literally talking about inflation (I.E. money printing). The comparison would be meaningless if I first adjusted for how much debt and money has been created since 1988.

By @renewiltord - 5 months
Yeah because the thing probably doesn't work lol. Putting it up there would reveal that.
By @shiroiushi - 5 months
With the coming Trump administration, NASA should just wind down its operations and greatly reduce its ambition to only very small, sure-fire things it can get done with a small budget. Obviously, America isn't going to be the leader in space exploration in the future.
By @xyst - 5 months
Why does NASA rely on all of these contractors? Government work is so inefficient.
By @cryptica - 5 months
That's the problem with our current socio-economic system, the level of deception near the power centers keeps growing ad-infinitum. It has become a kind of self-perpetuating corruption. Corruption occurs faster than it can be uncovered. It starts in small ways such as sub-optimal hiring practices, then progresses to full-blown nepotism and regulatory capture where there is essentially no accountability. Nobody is held accountable because nobody is willing to hold anybody else accountable because those who try to hold others accountable are replaced faster than they can blow a whistle.