A Brief History of AI: How Did We Get Here, and What's Next?
The article delves into AI's history, from ancient myths to modern breakthroughs. It discusses key figures, AI branches, and future possibilities, stressing the importance of past insights for anticipating AI's evolution.
Read original article
The article discusses the history and future of artificial intelligence (AI), tracing its roots back to ancient myths and highlighting key milestones in the field. It emphasizes the importance of collaboration, breakthrough innovations, and periods of rapid progress in the development of AI. The narrative covers the evolution of AI from the 1950s to the present day, mentioning influential figures like Alan Turing and Claude Shannon. The piece explores different definitions of intelligence and branches of AI philosophy, such as narrow AI and general AI. It also touches on the concept of super AI and the singularity. The author shares personal anecdotes about their father's influence on their tech career and reflects on the rapid advancements in generative AI. The article aims to provide insights into how AI has evolved and what the future may hold, emphasizing the significance of understanding the past to anticipate the future of artificial intelligence.
Related
Analysing 16,625 papers to figure out where AI is headed next (2019)
MIT Technology Review analyzed 16,625 AI papers, noting deep learning's potential decline. Trends include shifts to machine learning, neural networks' rise, and reinforcement learning growth. AI techniques cycle, with future dominance uncertain.
'Superintelligence,' Ten Years On
Nick Bostrom's book "Superintelligence" from 2014 shaped the AI alignment debate, highlighting risks of artificial superintelligence surpassing human intellect. Concerns include misalignment with human values and skepticism about AI achieving sentience. Discussions emphasize safety in AI advancement.
Superintelligence–10 Years Later
Reflection on the impact of Nick Bostrom's "Superintelligence" book after a decade, highlighting AI evolution, risks, safety concerns, regulatory calls, and the shift towards AI safety by influential figures and researchers.
From GPT-4 to AGI: Counting the OOMs
The article discusses AI advancements from GPT-2 to GPT-4, highlighting progress towards Artificial General Intelligence by 2027. It emphasizes model improvements, automation potential, and the need for awareness in AI development.
Someone is wrong on the internet (AGI Doom edition)
The blog post critiques the existential risk of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), questioning fast takeoff scenarios and emphasizing practical knowledge over doomsday predictions. It challenges assumptions and advocates for nuanced understanding.
1 commentsRelated
Analysing 16,625 papers to figure out where AI is headed next (2019)
MIT Technology Review analyzed 16,625 AI papers, noting deep learning's potential decline. Trends include shifts to machine learning, neural networks' rise, and reinforcement learning growth. AI techniques cycle, with future dominance uncertain.
'Superintelligence,' Ten Years On
Nick Bostrom's book "Superintelligence" from 2014 shaped the AI alignment debate, highlighting risks of artificial superintelligence surpassing human intellect. Concerns include misalignment with human values and skepticism about AI achieving sentience. Discussions emphasize safety in AI advancement.
Superintelligence–10 Years Later
Reflection on the impact of Nick Bostrom's "Superintelligence" book after a decade, highlighting AI evolution, risks, safety concerns, regulatory calls, and the shift towards AI safety by influential figures and researchers.
From GPT-4 to AGI: Counting the OOMs
The article discusses AI advancements from GPT-2 to GPT-4, highlighting progress towards Artificial General Intelligence by 2027. It emphasizes model improvements, automation potential, and the need for awareness in AI development.
Someone is wrong on the internet (AGI Doom edition)
The blog post critiques the existential risk of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), questioning fast takeoff scenarios and emphasizing practical knowledge over doomsday predictions. It challenges assumptions and advocates for nuanced understanding.