July 19th, 2024

FOSS funding vanishes from EU's 2025 Horizon program plans

Advocates raise concerns over disappearing funding for FOSS initiatives in the EU's Horizon program 2025 proposal. NGI's impact report underscores success but worries persist about future resources and support.

Read original articleLink Icon
FOSS funding vanishes from EU's 2025 Horizon program plans

Advocates express concern as funding for free and open source software (FOSS) initiatives under the EU's Horizon program is reportedly disappearing from the 2025 proposal. Pierre-Yves Gibello, CEO of OW2, criticized the elimination of funding for the Next Generation Internet (NGI) initiative, emphasizing the importance of FOSS in protecting European interests from data exploitation. NGI's impact report highlighted the success of funded projects in providing alternatives to market solutions and supporting EU regulations like GDPR. Despite ongoing projects being funded for now, worries persist about the future availability of resources for research and innovation in Europe. The 2025 Horizon Europe Work Programme is still being finalized, with a shift towards more focused funding and consolidation of research focus. While NGI is expected to receive funding under specific areas, concerns remain about the overall support for community building and internet infrastructure. The European Commission has not commented on the matter, and the finalized Work Programme is expected to be adopted in the second quarter of the following year.

Link Icon 7 comments
By @jfinkhaeuser - 3 months
The open letter and sign-on opportunity can be found here: https://www.ow2.org/view/Events/The_European_Union_must_keep...
By @j-pb - 3 months
Does anyone know any good FOSS projects that were actually funded by this?

I feel like the people deciding what (research and technology) to fund in the EU generally have very poor taste in their selections. I assume that they are non-technical as they often seem to choose the projects that make the most ambitious claims about social impact and EU values, but have very little to none technical merit.

Stuff like Rust, that could be a real technological advantage for the EU, is not funded, but weird blockchain semantic web foo is https://www.ngi.eu/

By @devwastaken - 3 months
There are many things yet to be done that don't fit as a product and are best served open source.

Short list of things that don't exist:

- universal datetime library for all major languages that can parse all formats, timezone aware, and is convenient to use.

- universal permissions and paths library. Filesystem, network filepaths, both for windows acls, Linux and Mac's extended perms. How can I know if I have read permission before reading? Or that I can traverse a directory before trying?

- memory safe openssl

- memory safe small footprint embeddable html/css renderer for universal GUI's and small arm computers. (not webview)

- USB c protocols for embedded devices.

- improvements to kicad to implement smart trace routing.

- any pain point or plumbing that really should be apart of a language/library already.

By @idle_zealot - 3 months
This is the first I've heard of "Web 4.0," and the pairing of the terminology with "virtual worlds" is... interesting. Is the EU funding metaverse development in anticipation that it will be important (lol), or am I misinterpreting "virtual world" here?
By @lagt_t - 3 months
Between this and the Cyber Resilience Act sheesh
By @walterbell - 3 months
> .. more than a third of NGI programs involve supporting compliance with the EU's GDPR law and its Cyber Resilience Act, while a further 23 percent are involved with implementation of Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act rules.. some of it's important for helping the EU implement laws around digital goods and services. Without necessary funding, such implementations could be imperiled.

Funding cuts for CRA compliance and DSA/DMA enforcement?