Academic journals are a lucrative scam – and we're determined to change that
Academic publishing giants profit heavily from free content, charging universities high fees. Advocates propose "diamond" open access funded by agencies to combat inflated costs and low-quality journals, aiming to enhance research dissemination.
Read original articleAcademic journals have become a lucrative industry, with major publishers like Elsevier and Wiley generating billions in revenue and profit margins rivaling tech giants like Google. Despite academics providing the content for free, these publishers charge universities exorbitant fees for access, hindering research dissemination. The commercialization of academic publishing has led to a proliferation of low-quality journals and inflated costs, with universities paying millions to access their own research. To combat this, some academics are advocating for "diamond" open access, where funding agencies directly support journals without charging authors or readers. However, transitioning to this model faces challenges due to the current system's prestige and career incentives. By promoting open access and editorial independence, academics aim to revolutionize scholarly publishing, making research accessible to all and countering disinformation in the public sphere.
Related
500k Books Have Been Deleted from the Internet Archive's Lending Library
500,000 books removed from Internet Archive's Open Library due to publishers' lawsuit. Legal battle restricts eBook lending, aiming to control distribution and pricing, challenging libraries' role in providing access to information.
Finland group downgrades 60 journals
A panel in Finland downgraded 60 journals in their rating system based on feedback from researchers. The move affects notable publishers like MDPI, Wiley, and Frontiers, impacting researchers' publication decisions. JUFO emphasizes transparency and peer review quality, advocating for community feedback in assessing publication credibility.
Shadow Library
Shadow libraries, like Anna's Archive and Library Genesis, offer free access to academic content behind paywalls. Despite legal concerns, they persist, aiding the Open Access movement and sparking debates among academics.
Academic journals are a lucrative scam – and we're determined to change that
Academic publishing by major companies like Elsevier and Wiley profits from free content, selling access at high prices. Scholars push for direct university funding to ensure open access and combat fake research.
So you want to compete with or replace open source
The article delves into open source software's evolution, business challenges, and emerging movements like "post-open" and "Fair Source." It questions their ability to balance commercial interests with open source collaboration.
actually, making a github for peer review research papers would actually be pretty cool.
this is also relevant, similar thing happening in mathematics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Gowers#Elsevier_boycot...
Related
500k Books Have Been Deleted from the Internet Archive's Lending Library
500,000 books removed from Internet Archive's Open Library due to publishers' lawsuit. Legal battle restricts eBook lending, aiming to control distribution and pricing, challenging libraries' role in providing access to information.
Finland group downgrades 60 journals
A panel in Finland downgraded 60 journals in their rating system based on feedback from researchers. The move affects notable publishers like MDPI, Wiley, and Frontiers, impacting researchers' publication decisions. JUFO emphasizes transparency and peer review quality, advocating for community feedback in assessing publication credibility.
Shadow Library
Shadow libraries, like Anna's Archive and Library Genesis, offer free access to academic content behind paywalls. Despite legal concerns, they persist, aiding the Open Access movement and sparking debates among academics.
Academic journals are a lucrative scam – and we're determined to change that
Academic publishing by major companies like Elsevier and Wiley profits from free content, selling access at high prices. Scholars push for direct university funding to ensure open access and combat fake research.
So you want to compete with or replace open source
The article delves into open source software's evolution, business challenges, and emerging movements like "post-open" and "Fair Source." It questions their ability to balance commercial interests with open source collaboration.