July 23rd, 2024

Hugo awards reveal thousands spent on fraudulent votes to help one writer win

Nearly 400 fraudulent votes, 10% of total, aimed to sway Hugo Awards. Subcommittee removed 377 fake votes favoring "Finalist A" to maintain integrity. No evidence of finalist involvement. £16,965 scheme exposed.

Read original articleLink Icon
Hugo awards reveal thousands spent on fraudulent votes to help one writer win

The Hugo Awards organizers disclosed that nearly 400 votes, constituting about 10% of all votes, were fraudulently purchased to assist a specific finalist in winning. The Hugo administration subcommittee identified 377 votes with fake names or disqualifying characteristics, mostly favoring "Finalist A." These votes were notably different from typical patterns, prompting an investigation. While there is no evidence Finalist A was involved, the subcommittee removed the fraudulent votes from the final count to uphold the awards' integrity. The scheme likely cost over £16,965, involving the purchase of World Science Fiction Society memberships. Despite the incident, the subcommittee assured voters that the legitimate ballots were fairly counted and winners were not affected. The Hugo Awards, a prestigious recognition in science fiction and fantasy writing, will proceed with the winners' announcement at the Worldcon convention in Glasgow. The incident follows previous controversies, including authors being excluded from last year's shortlists due to sensitivities in China.

Related

Professor Charged for Operating Multimillion-Dollar Grant Fraud Scheme

Professor Charged for Operating Multimillion-Dollar Grant Fraud Scheme

A Pennsylvania medical professor, Hoau-Yan Wang, faces indictment for allegedly defrauding the NIH of $16 million in grant funds by fabricating data for Alzheimer's research. Charges include major fraud and carry up to 20-year prison sentences.

Research into homeopathy: data falsification, fabrication and manipulation

Research into homeopathy: data falsification, fabrication and manipulation

Research on homeopathy faces credibility issues due to data manipulation in a study led by Michael Frass. The study, once positive, now raises concerns of scientific misconduct, urging withdrawal of publication. Challenges persist in alternative medicine research, highlighting the conflict between ideology and scientific integrity.

When scientific citations go rogue: Uncovering 'sneaked references'

When scientific citations go rogue: Uncovering 'sneaked references'

Researchers discovered "sneaked references," a new academic fraud involving adding extra references to boost citation counts. This manipulation distorts research visibility. Recommendations include rigorous verification and transparency in managing citations.

Hugo Awards Disqualification Statement

Hugo Awards Disqualification Statement

The Glasgow 2024 Worldcon disqualified 377 votes in the final Hugo Awards ballot due to fraud. Finalist A remains unaffected. Transparency and integrity are prioritized for the upcoming ceremony on August 11, 2024.

Glasgow 2024 Hugo Awards Statement – 22 July, 2024

Glasgow 2024 Hugo Awards Statement – 22 July, 2024

The Glasgow 2024 Hugo Awards revealed fraudulent votes favoring Finalist A. 377 invalid votes were disqualified, impacting the final tally. Transparency and fair play were emphasized. Full results to be published post-ceremony.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @ilrwbwrkhv - 9 months
The whole publishing and book industry needs a drastic disruption.

It's still in the dark ages. While Amazon tried doing something with self publishing, that doesn't work either.

Hoping with AI and things someone tries to build something new in this space.

By @more_corn - 9 months
If they hadn’t been ham-fisted about it they’d have gotten away with it. They used clearly fake names, several levels of idiocy. I shudder to think what similar campaigns are conducted by people who are less idiotic about it.