July 23rd, 2024

Frustrated Californians May Be Ready for a Tougher Approach to Crime

Frustrated Californians push for tougher crime measures amid shoplifting and drug issues. Debate over rolling back Proposition 47 divides opinions. Governor Newsom favors limited anti-crime actions, contrasting coalition's call for stricter penalties.

Read original articleLink Icon
Frustrated Californians May Be Ready for a Tougher Approach to Crime

Frustrated Californians are considering a tougher stance on crime due to issues like shoplifting and fentanyl use. Retailers are locking up items, and there is a debate on rolling back Proposition 47, which reduced penalties for shoplifting and drug possession. A coalition wants harsher punishments, while Governor Newsom opposes this, preferring more limited anti-crime measures. The fate of Proposition 47 will be decided by voters in November. Supporters of the rollback believe it will deter crime, while opponents argue that the problem's scope is not fully understood. The debate reflects a shift in public sentiment towards stiffer punishment, with concerns about rising crime rates. The issue has sparked a political brawl in Sacramento, highlighting the complex challenges facing California in addressing crime and drug-related problems. The decision on Proposition 47 will have significant implications for the state's criminal justice system and approaches to tackling crime and drug use.

Related

California's Gov. Newsom wants to restrict smartphone usage in schools – AP News

California's Gov. Newsom wants to restrict smartphone usage in schools – AP News

California Governor Gavin Newsom plans to limit smartphone use in schools to address mental health concerns linked to social media. This aligns with a national debate, including Surgeon General's call for warning labels. Local control and regulations are advocated.

Grand Jury Finds Sacramento Cops Illegally Shared Driver Data

Grand Jury Finds Sacramento Cops Illegally Shared Driver Data

The Sacramento County Grand Jury found illegal driver data sharing by the Sheriff's Office and Police Department, violating state law. Recommendations include compliance with the Attorney General's guidance and public disclosure of ALPR policies. Organizations like EFF and ACLU advocate for enforcement of privacy laws.

California to impose permanent water restrictions on cities and towns

California to impose permanent water restrictions on cities and towns

California will enforce permanent water restrictions to reduce statewide water usage by nearly 30% over 15 years. The policy, effective from January 1, 2025, faces resistance from water agencies but support from environmental groups.

The geography of crime in four U.S. cities: Perceptions and reality (2023)

The geography of crime in four U.S. cities: Perceptions and reality (2023)

A tough-on-crime candidate winning the Chicago mayoral primary reflects crime's impact on U.S. cities like Denver and Philadelphia. Amidst the pandemic, fear of crime, fueled by media coverage, hinders downtown recovery efforts, affecting office closures and public transit. Brookings Metro's research on city crime perceptions offers policy solutions for safe urban environments.

California just cut the red tape on housing in San Francisco. Is L.A. next?

California just cut the red tape on housing in San Francisco. Is L.A. next?

California's Senate Bill 423 aims to accelerate housing construction in San Francisco by reducing approval times from two years to six months. The law streamlines permitting processes to address housing shortages statewide.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @yawpitch - 9 months
> With financial help from the giant retailers Target, Home Depot and Walmart, the coalition has gotten a ballot measure qualified for the November election that would impose harsher punishments for crimes that result in lighter charges or no prosecution today.

Yeah, cause that’s how direct democracy should work.

For those without California context, ballot measures are the means by which the monied seek to bypass the legislature by appealing to the worst instincts of voters directly. They’re a feature and a bug of Californian democracy.