"We can't decide so we cheat and bundle 12 objectives under 3 priorities"

Organizations often struggle to limit their strategic priorities to just three, leading to the bundling of multiple objectives under fewer categories. This tendency arises from the pressure to address numerous challenges simultaneously, which can result in ineffective progress. To combat this, it is essential to implement simple rules that prioritize focus, such as limiting the number of strategic priorities, projects, and daily tasks. Additionally, organizations should consider breaking down long-term goals into manageable phases, allowing for concentrated efforts on one priority at a time.

Another common issue is the constant addition of new tasks without removing existing ones, which can overwhelm teams. Establishing routines for subtraction, such as eliminating recurring meetings or discontinuing underperforming products, can help maintain balance. Furthermore, while inclusivity in idea generation is valuable, it can lead to an overwhelming number of suggestions. Organizations should vet ideas through anonymous voting or align them with strategic priorities to filter out less relevant proposals.

Ultimately, the ability to say no is crucial for leaders to maintain focus on what truly matters. By cultivating this skill, organizations can avoid the pitfalls of overextension and ensure that their efforts yield meaningful results.