July 24th, 2024

What "consent" looks like for the DEA and TSA

DEA and TSA collaborate to seize travelers' cash using informers and airport checkpoints. Video shows DEA agents ignoring refusals to search, sparking a lawsuit against illegal searches and seizures. Travelers resist systemic targeting.

Read original articleLink Icon
What "consent" looks like for the DEA and TSA

The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) have been collaborating to seize travelers' money through questionable practices. The DEA pays informers to identify individuals potentially carrying large sums of cash, and the TSA assists in identifying these individuals at airport checkpoints. Despite travelers' objections, the DEA agents claim consent to search and seize money through civil forfeiture. Similar operations occur on Amtrak trains with the US Customs and Border Protection. A video by the Institute for Justice demonstrates how DEA agents disregard refusals to search, highlighting the lack of meaningful consent. An ongoing lawsuit reveals the prevalence of illegal searches and seizures under the pretext of consent. Despite resistance from the DEA and TSA, evidence suggests a systemic practice of targeting travelers with cash. The plaintiffs aim to challenge these practices and seek justice for affected travelers.

Related

Law enforcement is spying on Americans' mail, records show

Law enforcement is spying on Americans' mail, records show

The U.S. Postal Service shares Americans' mail details with law enforcement through the mail covers program, aiding investigations without court orders. Critics raise privacy concerns, while the Postal Service defends the program's legality and limited scope.

Adderall Shortage Caused by DEA Quotas on Controlled Substances

Adderall Shortage Caused by DEA Quotas on Controlled Substances

The Adderall shortage, linked to DEA quotas, impacts ADHD patients. Despite efforts to address the issue, the DEA's inflexible approach exacerbates the crisis, prompting calls for systemic reform to alleviate suffering.

DEA Caught Red-Handed: Airport Intimidation [video]

DEA Caught Red-Handed: Airport Intimidation [video]

The Institute for Justice showcases cases of innocent travelers having cash seized by DEA agents, emphasizing the importance of knowing and defending one's rights during encounters with law enforcement.

It's never been easier for the cops to break into your phone

It's never been easier for the cops to break into your phone

Law enforcement, including the FBI, uses advanced tools to access suspects' phones rapidly. Recent events highlight agencies' access to phone-hacking tools like Cellebrite, sparking debates on privacy versus law enforcement requirements.

You can opt out of airport face scans

You can opt out of airport face scans

Passengers can opt out of airport facial recognition for US domestic flights by following specific steps. Challenges faced during opt-out prompt the Algorithmic Justice League's "Freedom Flyers" campaign. Concerns include data security, bias, and surveillance normalization. Opting out advocates for biometric rights.

Link Icon 28 comments
By @jacobn - 7 months
Any confiscated cash needs to go into state level or even federal coffers, not to the agency or local cops that did the confiscating. That removes the immediate incentive for abuse, while retaining the tool for what it was intended for: actual criminals.

(I don’t have the sources but read years ago that states that let the cops keep the cash have ridiculous levels of abusive confiscations, whereas states that have the money go to the state coffers basically don’t)

(Most civil asset forfeiture is done by local cops stopping people on the highway and similar)

By @edub - 7 months
I can't load the article, so this is likely off topic, but the memory came rushing back when I read this headline.

I attended a wedding that got hit by a major flash flood that required a rescue operation by boat and helicopter. Thankfully no one was seriously injured. A half dozen people were swept away and rescued from trees. The rest of us got to higher floors of the building and they were concerned about us waiting out the flood because cars from the parking lot floated and rammed the first floor of the building. It was featured on an episode of I Do, Redo.

They brought in busses to transport the 61 people rescued to the local high school where they had activated the Red Cross and provided us dry cloths and food. I can't say enough nice things about the Red Cross volunteers and the staff at the high school, and same with the fire department and EMS.

However, when we were loaded into the busses, the police held the busses until they had a drug dog come into the busses to walk up and down the aisles, and only after that let the busses take us to the high school. While no one was seriously injured physically, people were traumatized from the flooding event and many attendees suffered from PTSD for years.

It was so cruel for the police department to do what they did with everyone in the mental state that we were in.

For reasons I do not understand, we were not free to leave the high school, and even the people that did not lose their cars to the flood were required to go to the high school on the busses. I can't recall how long they detained us at the high school, I'd guess 3 to 5 hours, and then they let us leave. The friend that came to pick me up (I did lose my vehicle to the flood) got to the high school not long after I did and had to wait in the parking lot for hours.

We wanted to feel safe once we got to dry land after the ordeal we went through. I did not feel safe until I got home.

By @joezydeco - 7 months
If you want to see an example of what this looks like, the Institute has a video recorded by a passenger that knew his rights.

https://youtu.be/0XBzV0bDZdQ

By @xyst - 7 months
The one encounter with the DEA agent reminds me of cheap, sleazy, sales tactics used at car dealerships. High pressure tactics to force an action.

Civil forfeiture is absolutely insane. The “war on drugs” needs to end. Legalize all drugs. Dissolve the DEA. Tax all drugs. Earmark part of the sales towards drug addiction treatment and mental health.

By @menage - 7 months
This video linked in the article (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XBzV0bDZdQ) makes me want to donate to Institute for Justice to maybe help stop this practice. But a bit of Googling shows that IfJ were also one of the legal forces behind the Citizens United decision, which is something I really don't want to support.
By @blendo - 7 months
The average person has the same recourse to a cop’s injustice as the average slave had to a slave catcher.
By @banku_brougham - 7 months
Has anybody mentioned the fourth amendment? All this talk of rationale is misguided. The plain meaning of the 4th has been undermined by our corrupted court system.
By @nullc - 7 months
I wonder what would happen if large amounts of travelers started carrying movie prop money? Could we churn out large numbers of plaintiffs with standing against the government, without losing substantial amounts of actual money?

I've seen one of these searches happen to another passenger first hand it's absurd.

By @spiritplumber - 7 months
Stupid question, but what happens if I carry my cash in a container that requests access to an attorney and, if not given it, calls an attorney itself? (Let's say it's a pouch that can't be opened without destroying it, with a basic android phone built into it, that will also document its own destruction as much as it can if it comes to that).

Bonus point if we give it a plaintive cute kitten voice so that the recording shows it pleading for its life.

(If you want to buy one of these, I'll gladly sell you it)

By @LightHugger - 7 months
The free country where cops can mug you under threat of state backed violence, steal your money, and you won't get any due process, it's just gone. Ok.

Extreme reform is required at this point...

By @Havoc - 7 months
US borders is one of the things really dampening my enthusiasm for tourism to it.
By @thelastgallon - 7 months
Charlie Munger “Show me the incentives, and I’ll show you the outcome.”

If there were a law that directs confiscated money to one of: pay for medical bills of the poorest, rehabilitation of those with prison history, federal disaster relief fund, gender affirming care, phone bills in prisons, etc. None of these are my actual positions, these are just examples to remove the perverse incentive to steal.

By @tuhriel - 7 months
This somehow reminds me of the TV show "Supernatural" where Angels need 'consent' of the people to possess their body. Which basically is "they said yes", and often how they get the 'yes' contains a lot of deceit (pretending to be someone else etc) misdirection and even torture...
By @dmitrygr - 7 months
Al Capone would blush in shame for his small-time scams compared to what the USGOV has been doing with Civil Asses Forfeiture
By @ct520 - 7 months
Yeah... They use to pay 10% of the "bounty" seized. Not sure what the going rate is with the heat now and days. The war on drugs lol.. war on peoples rights. Warrantless GPS trackers, then it was stingrays.. quite an intersting organization. They use some .. unique software. Penlink use to publish their software updates publicly was a good read. (you can probably find it on wayback machine) Interesting software to say the least.. https://www.penlink.com/digital-intelligence-original-work-2...
By @heinrich5991 - 7 months
By @teractiveodular - 7 months
Seems to be hugged to death, here's archive.is:

https://archive.is/2024.07.24-000026/https://papersplease.or...

By @LanceH - 7 months
I've always thought that when they ask the questions of, "did you pack this bag? and "has this been in your possession?" that it is more about drug convictions than safety.
By @puppycodes - 7 months
Halt!! On behalf of the king thy assets are forfeit!
By @righthand - 7 months
By @EricE - 7 months
Site seems to be overwhelmed - archive: https://archive.is/yQhw3
By @colinprince - 7 months
By @robertclaus - 7 months
Wow, I didn't know this was a thing. Scary stuff.
By @OutOfHere - 7 months
Say what you will about Bitcoin and crypto, but it absolutely prevents this nonsense.