July 24th, 2024

Kamala Harris win could mean a continued relatively smooth runway for AI firms

Vice President Kamala Harris has influenced A.I. policy, advocating for safety standards and accountability, but legislative progress is limited. Her presidency may continue a moderate regulatory approach towards A.I. companies.

Read original articleLink Icon
Kamala Harris win could mean a continued relatively smooth runway for AI firms

Vice President Kamala Harris has played a significant role in shaping artificial intelligence (A.I.) policy during her time in the White House, focusing on voluntary safety standards and executive orders for federal A.I. use. Despite her efforts to push Congress for regulations to protect individuals from potential job losses and other harms caused by A.I., little legislative progress has been made. As the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, a Harris presidency may continue the trend of minimal regulation for A.I. companies, which have largely been able to influence governmental perspectives on the technology. Harris has a history of advocating for corporate accountability, stemming from her previous roles as California's district attorney and attorney general, where she pushed for laws addressing cyberbullying and online privacy. Her connections to the tech industry, including ties to companies like Uber and past engagements with Google and Facebook, may facilitate the formation of advisory teams focused on tech policy. Under the Biden administration, scrutiny of Big Tech has increased, with antitrust investigations against major companies. However, concrete regulatory actions on A.I. remain limited, despite growing concerns about its societal impacts. Harris emphasizes the need for a balance between innovation and public safety, advocating for accountability from tech companies. Her approach reflects a willingness to engage with the tech industry while also holding it responsible for its societal effects, suggesting that her presidency could maintain a moderate stance on A.I. regulation.

Related

A Hacker Stole OpenAI Secrets, Raising Fears That China Could, Too

A Hacker Stole OpenAI Secrets, Raising Fears That China Could, Too

A hacker breached OpenAI's internal messaging systems, accessing discussions on A.I. tech. No code was compromised. The incident sparked internal debates on security and A.I. risks amid global competition.

Former DARPA chief, now White House OSTP director: time to regulate AI is now

Former DARPA chief, now White House OSTP director: time to regulate AI is now

Arati Prabhakar, from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, stresses AI regulation urgency. She leads advising on science, tech, and innovation for President Biden, focusing on R&D, AI safety, semiconductors, and government subsidies' impact.

Can AI Be Meaningfully Regulated, or Is Regulation a Deceitful Fudge?

Can AI Be Meaningfully Regulated, or Is Regulation a Deceitful Fudge?

Governments consider regulating AI due to its potential and risks, focusing on generative AI controlled by Big Tech. Challenges include balancing profit motives with ethical development. Various regulation models and debates on effectiveness persist.

Trump allies want to "Make America First in AI" with sweeping executive order

Trump allies want to "Make America First in AI" with sweeping executive order

Allies of Trump draft AI executive order to enhance military tech, ease regulations. Proposal includes "Manhattan Projects" for military AI, industry-led agencies, and aligns with Republican party's AI development platform. Shifting political alliances noted.

AI companies promised to self-regulate one year ago. What's changed?

AI companies promised to self-regulate one year ago. What's changed?

AI companies like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft committed to safe AI development with the White House. Progress includes red-teaming practices and watermarks, but lacks transparency and accountability. Efforts like red-teaming exercises, collaboration with experts, and information sharing show improvement. Encryption and bug bounty programs enhance security, but independent verification and more actions are needed for AI safety and trust.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @LorenDB - 7 months
I thought Donald Trump was promising massive investments in AI[0] (at least for military purposes). Is there an advantage for AI companies in Kamala's hands-off approach instead of Trump's approach of actively assisting AI development? Because Trump politics aside, I think most AI companies are going to prefer government funding over a simple commitment to not hinder their development.

[0]: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/07/trump...

By @Terretta - 7 months
TL;DR: U.S. VP Kamala Harris played a leading role in A.I. policy, meeting execs, pushing for voluntary safety standards, and advocating for regulation to protect against potential harms. Her administration might continue a relatively hands-off approach to A.I., allowing companies to shape policy and maintain low regulation.

https://archive.is/GSZfm

By @saddat - 7 months
So the A.I. Overloaded making sure it will happen