July 25th, 2024

A chemist explains the chemistry behind decaf coffee

Decaffeination processes remove caffeine from coffee using methods like carbon dioxide, Swiss water, and solvent-based techniques, achieving 94% to 98% caffeine removal while attempting to preserve flavor and aroma.

Read original articleLink Icon
ConcernAdmirationSkepticism
A chemist explains the chemistry behind decaf coffee

Decaffeination processes aim to remove caffeine from coffee while preserving its flavor and aroma. There are three primary methods used: the carbon dioxide method, the Swiss water process, and solvent-based methods. The carbon dioxide method, developed in the 1970s, utilizes high-pressure CO₂ to extract caffeine from moistened coffee beans, removing 96% to 98% of caffeine while leaving minimal CO₂ residue. The Swiss water process, introduced in the 1980s, involves soaking green coffee beans in hot water to extract caffeine and flavor compounds, then filtering the water to remove caffeine before reintroducing it to new beans, achieving a caffeine removal rate of 94% to 96%. Solvent-based methods, dating back to the early 1900s, use organic solvents like ethyl acetate and methylene chloride to extract caffeine. These methods can remove about 96% to 97% of caffeine. While ethyl acetate is considered safe, methylene chloride has strict consumption limits, and any residual amounts in coffee are well below safety thresholds. All decaffeination methods inevitably remove some flavor compounds, but techniques like the Swiss water process attempt to reintroduce some of these lost flavors. Ultimately, these processes allow consumers to enjoy coffee without caffeine, although some flavor loss is unavoidable.

Related

Passive direct air capture using calcium oxide powder

Passive direct air capture using calcium oxide powder

Passive direct air capture with CaO powder relies on water vapor for CO2 removal. Higher humidity levels enhance CaO hydration but hinder carbonation. Manipulating humidity levels can optimize CO2 removal efficiency.

How rules made in Europe put Ethiopian farmers at risk

How rules made in Europe put Ethiopian farmers at risk

Ethiopia's coffee industry faces challenges with new EU regulations requiring proof of deforestation-free products. Farmers struggle to meet criteria, risking access to the European market. Some view regulations positively.

Genetic differences found to influence coffee drinking behaviors

Genetic differences found to influence coffee drinking behaviors

Genetic differences influence coffee drinking behaviors. Research identifies 7 genetic loci linked to coffee intake, affecting caffeine metabolism. Genetic correlations exist with substance use traits. Discrepancies across populations suggest cultural influences.

Caffeine suppresses cerebral grey matter responses to chronic sleep restriction

Caffeine suppresses cerebral grey matter responses to chronic sleep restriction

A study examined caffeine's impact on grey matter during sleep restriction. Caffeine intake led to reduced grey matter in specific brain regions compared to decaf. Adenosine receptors may mediate these effects, suggesting caffeine worsens grey matter reduction during sleep deprivation.

A chemist explains the chemistry behind decaf coffee

A chemist explains the chemistry behind decaf coffee

Decaffeination of coffee uses methods like carbon dioxide, Swiss water, and solvent-based techniques to remove caffeine while preserving flavor, typically leaving about 7 milligrams of caffeine in an 8-ounce cup.

AI: What people are saying
The comments on the decaffeination processes reveal various perspectives and concerns regarding decaf coffee.
  • There are doubts about the quality of beans used in decaf coffee, with some suggesting lower quality may affect taste.
  • Concerns about the safety of solvents used in decaffeination processes, particularly ethyl acetate and dichloromethane, are raised.
  • Some commenters express a desire for better-tasting decaf options and question why genetic modifications for caffeine-free beans aren't more common.
  • Experiences with different decaffeination methods vary, with some preferring CO2 over Swiss Water for flavor retention.
  • There is a call for more attention and priority to be given to high-quality decaf coffee in the market.
Link Icon 19 comments
By @martinpw - 9 months
The decaf process seems expensive so you might expect the end result to cost more, but it never does. Which means either the producers are making less profit on decaf, or they are using lower quality beans. If the latter is true, which seems more likely, that might explain why decaf sometimes tastes less good, separately from the effect of the process itself on taste.
By @iscrewyou - 9 months
A good video explanation from James Hoffman: https://youtu.be/yYTSdlOdkn0

And a quick follow up: https://youtu.be/IszQ2JR3Olc

By @gcanyon - 9 months
Nile Red demonstrates removing caffeine from tea here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIbff5iD0GQ

and from coffee here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CoxEgbyeK4

By @zokier - 9 months
It is somewhat magical to me that these processes can be as selective as they are. Coffee beans must have hundreds if not thousands of organic compounds in them, and somehow something as simple as co2 (or the other solvents) picks up mainly caffeine. Somehow that is very counterintuitive to me.
By @jmann99999 - 9 months
The way this author[0] took complex scientific processes and made them understandable to someone without a science background is admirable. I want to try and emulate this when I write for non-technical audiences.

[0]https://miamioh.edu/profiles/cas/michael-crowder.html

By @RamblingCTO - 9 months
I wonder why we don't use genetic modifications to get caffeine free coffee?
By @pillefitz - 9 months
I'd love if all psychoactive compounds could be removed from coffee beans. The stress response and inability to sleep I get from decaf beans is pretty much comparable to that from normal beans (and distinctly different from pure caffeine or green tea)
By @eirikbakke - 9 months
So, in the Swiss Water process, caffeine-free coffee is made by soaking the beans in... caffeine-free coffee?

(My initial though was, "then how do you get the cafeeine-free coffee in the first place", but I see the answer is that you can decaffeinate liquids by running them through charcoal filters... something you can't do with solid beans.)

By @jb1991 - 9 months
I love decaf but the main problem is how fragile the stability of the beans are. They go bad quickly. To get the same cup of decaf coffee every day requires more work if you are grinding your own and making espresso. Still, I love them.

Personally, I've found the CO2 method to have a lot more flavor than the Swiss Water. I also found the CO2 beans don't deteriorate as quickly as the Swiss Water beans.

By @hooverd - 9 months
SWP is trendy and "chemical-free" but in my experience every decaf made with it is lacking something. C02 is neutral. EA is probably the best for fruity coffees.
By @bishfish - 9 months
Why not try low caffeine variety like Laurina? It's about 1/3 to 1/2 the caffeine of Arabica.
By @Murky3515 - 9 months
TIL about one of the solvents involved, ethyl acetate, and the fact that it is not good for you. How do I know that my local coffee shop's machine is working correctly and provides only safe levels of this solvent?
By @abcd_f - 9 months
It'd be interesting to compare these 3 methods side by side starting with same beans.

I've tried, conservatively, a dozen and a half of different decafs available here in the EU, and some a markedly better than others. In fact, most are outright garbage with an exception of two that are virtually indistinguishable from each other even though they are from unrelated brands. So I wonder if the differences are due to the process rather something else.

By @deegles - 9 months
I thought about buying a supercritical CO2 extraction machine from Alibaba and having a small business around making decaf beans for roasters, but the numbers didn't work out great. I believe it was around $20k usd for the medium sized ones.
By @xnavra50 - 9 months
Well, they used some unhealthy solvents to extract the caffeine in the past. Swiss water method should be ok, but I just don't trust that some cheap company is not cheating in the process every now and then.

I drink regular coffee.

By @callalex - 9 months
Why are there no GMO decaf bean varieties? Is the caffeine really that necessary for pest control even when cultivated/farmed?
By @jollyllama - 9 months
Does it work the same for instant?
By @wnolens - 9 months
Will an entrepreneur please make high quality (great tasting) decaf coffee ubiquitous?

There's a growing anti-drug sentiment that should be a great tailwind.

It's hard for me to find as good tasting a bean as it is with non-decaf. I've tried subscription services or pay huge shipping and product premium from some boutique retailer, the beans are always just ok. Decaf still doesn't get enough priority as the product itself, always an afterthought it feels like.

By @AnotherGoodName - 9 months
I'd like to talk a bit more about the cheapest and most common process here. They state that ethyl acetate is below the FDA limits and therefore safe. For a start ethyl acetate is still pretty bad but it's not the cheapest.

Another common solvent not mentioned here is Dichloromethane. It's a pretty clear cancer causing agent https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/pr8k9v/til_s...

You know what else is a solvent for decaffeinating coffee? Benzene. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzene#Health_effects

Don't drink decaf. The CO2 method is pretty safe but the simple fact is unless you're sure how your beans were decaffinated you're better off not drinking it.