July 25th, 2024

Is the nervous system a democracy? (2016)

Nervous systems exhibit governance styles in decision-making, with "dictator neurons" enabling rapid responses and collective neuron activity reflecting democratic processes, enhancing adaptability and survival across species.

Read original articleLink Icon
Is the nervous system a democracy? (2016)

The organization of nervous systems in decision-making has been likened to various forms of government, such as democracy and dictatorship. Historically, psychologists like William James and Sir Charles Sherrington debated whether a single neuron could dominate behavior or if the nervous system operates as a collective of many cells. Research indicates that some behaviors are controlled by "dictator neurons," which can trigger rapid responses, such as a crayfish's tail-flip or a fish's escape movement, through electrical signals. These neurons integrate sensory information and command other neurons to execute movements. However, alternative pathways exist, allowing for more flexible responses, indicating a form of oligarchy in decision-making.

In contrast, many behaviors are governed by a democratic process, where multiple neurons contribute to the outcome. For instance, when a monkey reaches for an object, various neurons in the motor cortex generate spikes, with each neuron favoring a specific direction. This collective spiking can be mathematically analyzed to predict movement outcomes, akin to a voting system. Additionally, experiments show that even if certain neurons are silenced, others can compensate, demonstrating the robustness of this democratic approach.

Overall, nervous systems can exhibit multiple governance styles simultaneously, with dictator neurons acting quickly while other neurons refine movements, enhancing survival and adaptability. This complexity underscores the intricate nature of neural decision-making across different species.

Related

Open and remotely accessible Neuroplatform for research in wetware computing

Open and remotely accessible Neuroplatform for research in wetware computing

An open Neuroplatform for wetware computing research combines electrophysiology and AI with living neurons. It enables long-term experiments on brain organoids remotely, supporting complex studies for energy-efficient computing advancements.

Semantic encoding during language comprehension at single-cell resolution

Semantic encoding during language comprehension at single-cell resolution

Researchers studied how neurons in the human brain encode linguistic meaning during language comprehension. Neurons in the prefrontal cortex responded selectively to word meanings, reflecting semantic information based on sentence context. The study identified nine semantic domains where neurons selectively responded, shedding light on cortical organization of semantic representations.

Neuromorphic dendritic network with silent synapses for visual motion perception

Neuromorphic dendritic network with silent synapses for visual motion perception

Researchers developed dendristor, a neuromorphic model combining synaptic organization and dendritic morphology for visual motion perception. It uses silicon nanowire transistors and ion-doped sol-gel films to mimic dendritic computation, enabling direction selectivity and spatial motion perception in neural circuits.

Darwin Machines

Darwin Machines

The Darwin Machine theory proposes the brain uses evolution to efficiently solve problems. It involves minicolumns competing through firing patterns, leading to enhanced artificial intelligence and creativity through recombination in cortical columns.

Dopamine-mediated interactions between short- and long-term memory dynamics

Dopamine-mediated interactions between short- and long-term memory dynamics

Researchers studied dopamine's role in Drosophila memory dynamics. Dopamine signals encode innate and learned valences, regulating memory storage. Different neurons control short- and long-term memory formation, offering insights into memory regulation mechanisms.

Link Icon 10 comments
By @floam - 9 months
By @illuminant - 9 months
I would like to suggest that the mind has a holographic property, which means the more neurons in a cluster the more resolution they exhibit, at the same time as different parts of the minds specialize, and are dominant in various behavior loops, and these do raffle for consensus.

The illusion that is the singular self can run separate perspectives concurrently (sic., driving while self assembling a story narrative in the mind)

The random layperson's mind is a hodgepodge of their development. A well trained mind can compartmentalize, become sensitive to the slightest internal cognitive dispositions, and self specialize in ways you will accuse of being science fiction.

By @breck - 9 months
First, I was surprised Minsky's Society of Mind isn't mentioned. Worth checking out, if you are unfamiliar.

> A single “dictator neuron” can take charge of complex behaviors

My term for this theory is "Brain Pilots": https://breckyunits.com/brain-pilots.html

By @amy-petrik-214 - 9 months
For me it's self evident the argument is false by way of contradiction. Assume it's true. There exists a consciousness nerve cell, with a nucleus and such as all nerve cells have, somewhere in the mind. As far as how the brain is "built" during the embryonic stage, you'd expect that cell to have a typical "home" in the brain or brainstem somewhere. Then that "home" would be a known spot where if a stroke occurs, or other damage, at once eliminates forever that persons consciousness. But not so common core area such as this has ever been found, suggesting our assumption in the first place, that such a cell exists, is false.

Now that's one extreme, the all commanding cell. It's also self-evident that cells aren't some 'set of equals' commune. Of course there are master cells that activate other cells in certain conditions. This is seen even in our deep learning nets where you may have a "I see a cat" neuron and "I see a dog" neuron that triggers the response program for those things.

That's all to say, reality is a place in between

By @runarberg - 9 months
By @nonrandomstring - 9 months
> Is the nervous system a democracy?

I don't know much about neuroscience but right now democracy seems like a very nervous system.

By @akira2501 - 9 months
> Scientists have long used the metaphor of government to explain how they think nervous systems are organized for decision-making.

I've never seen this happen and I can't imagine anyone in the present day using "government" to describe "organized decision making."

By @yarg - 9 months
No? It's a meritocracy - evolution wouldn't spit out something that inefficient.
By @proc0 - 9 months
I suspect it's equivalent to a Universal Turing machine but I haven't seen any models or proofs on this. If that's the case then just like computers some nerve cells are switches that activate "programs" of thousands or more neurons, just like the article mentions.