July 26th, 2024

Monumental proof settles geometric Langlands conjecture

A team of nine mathematicians proved the geometric Langlands conjecture, a key aspect of the Langlands program, after 30 years of research, with implications for number theory and geometry.

Read original articleLink Icon
Monumental proof settles geometric Langlands conjecture

In a significant advancement in mathematics, a team of nine mathematicians has successfully proved the geometric Langlands conjecture, a central aspect of the Langlands program, which has been under investigation for 30 years. This proof, comprising over 800 pages across five papers, was led by Dennis Gaitsgory and Sam Raskin. The Langlands program, initiated by Robert Langlands in the 1960s, aims to create a comprehensive framework connecting number theory, geometry, and function fields, likened to a "Rosetta stone" for mathematics. The recent proof is considered the most comprehensive result in the geometric aspect of this program, with experts expressing confidence in its correctness due to its internal consistencies.

The geometric Langlands conjecture relates to compact Riemann surfaces and their fundamental groups, proposing a correspondence between these mathematical structures and certain complex functions known as eigensheaves. The proof builds on decades of foundational work and innovative ideas, particularly those of Alexander Beilinson and Vladimir Drinfeld, who linked the conjecture to conformal field theory. Gaitsgory's long-term dedication to this problem culminated in this breakthrough, which is expected to have profound implications for various fields within mathematics. The proof not only resolves a longstanding question but also enriches the understanding of the relationships between different mathematical domains, reinforcing the Langlands program's status as a unifying theory in mathematics.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @proof_by_vibes - 3 months
This is exciting news! Though, there is more than just the math that needs to be done here. Namely, mathematicians not only need to formalize a concise language to bridge the gap with modern conformal field theory, but they will also need a way to understand the computability of models based on this system. And yet, there is also the human factor: namely, there needs to be an effort to sell this paradigm to existing theorists, which will require substantial effort.
By @slanderaan01 - 3 months
I'm curious what applications there might be if any in number theory. If I recall, langlands had motivations from string theory concepts which ultimately wasn't as successful as hoped in physics.
By @dylanwenzlau - 3 months
Article and interspersed visuals were a pleasant learning experience. I'm not caught up on mathematics as much as I'd like to be..
By @ur-whale - 3 months
Is there a machine-verifiable version ?

I mean ... 800 pages, I'd say the benefit of the doubt applies.

By @paulpauper - 3 months
How do people even find the time to work on this stuff without being distracted by life, family, and everything else? I think this is why so many of these people are in Europe. America is too chaotic and full of obligations and distractions to do serious academic work.