July 27th, 2024

A new movement of luddites is rising up against AI

An anti-AI movement is growing, echoing the Luddites, driven by concerns over employment, creative exploitation, and misuse. Activists seek dialogue and regulation, while public sentiment increasingly opposes unregulated AI development.

Read original articleLink Icon
A new movement of luddites is rising up against AI

A growing anti-AI movement, reminiscent of the historical Luddites, is emerging as backlash against artificial intelligence intensifies. Recent incidents highlight this trend, such as a lifestyle magazine's introduction of an AI-generated editor, which sparked outrage and led to a swift apology. Other examples include the cancellation of an AI-written film screening and Lego's removal of AI-generated images due to public pressure. Concerns driving this backlash include the impact of AI on employment, the exploitation of creative work, and the technology's potential for misuse, such as deepfakes and gender bias. Activists, now embracing the "luddite" label, seek dialogue and fair approaches to AI adoption rather than outright rejection. This movement is gaining traction through social media, allowing for greater organization and visibility. Unlikely alliances are forming, as seen when musicians supported record labels in a lawsuit against AI music companies for copyright infringement. While some view AI as a revolutionary opportunity, critics argue that the potential harms must be addressed before pursuing technological advancements. Companies like Nintendo have opted against using generative AI, reflecting a cautious approach. Public sentiment is increasingly against unregulated AI development, with protests occurring outside AI companies like OpenAI. The movement emphasizes the need for responsible AI practices and regulatory oversight to mitigate risks associated with the technology.

Related

Hackers 'jailbreak' powerful AI models in global effort to highlight flaws

Hackers 'jailbreak' powerful AI models in global effort to highlight flaws

Hackers exploit vulnerabilities in AI models from OpenAI, Google, and xAI, sharing harmful content. Ethical hackers challenge AI security, prompting the rise of LLM security start-ups amid global regulatory concerns. Collaboration is key to addressing evolving AI threats.

Ex-OpenAI staff call for "right to warn" about AI risks without retaliation

Ex-OpenAI staff call for "right to warn" about AI risks without retaliation

A group of former AI experts advocate for AI companies to allow employees to voice concerns without retaliation. They emphasize AI risks like inequality and loss of control, calling for transparency and a "right to warn."

Can AI Be Meaningfully Regulated, or Is Regulation a Deceitful Fudge?

Can AI Be Meaningfully Regulated, or Is Regulation a Deceitful Fudge?

Governments consider regulating AI due to its potential and risks, focusing on generative AI controlled by Big Tech. Challenges include balancing profit motives with ethical development. Various regulation models and debates on effectiveness persist.

AI is already taking jobs in video game industry

AI is already taking jobs in video game industry

AI's influence in gaming grows as companies like Activision Blizzard adopt generative AI, raising concerns about job security. Layoffs increase, but AI aims to boost efficiency without entirely replacing roles. Ethical worries persist.

A new movement of luddites is rising up against AI

A new movement of luddites is rising up against AI

An anti-AI movement is rising, echoing the Luddites, as public backlash grows against AI technologies threatening jobs and creativity. Activists seek dialogue and regulation, emphasizing ethical AI integration.

Link Icon 1 comments
By @dorkwood - 3 months
> Downtrodden workers used to be easier to ignore. The internet is the greatest tool for organising in history.

On its face the internet seems like a powerful organisation tool, but in reality it's quite bad. These online movements are often so large and prone to in-fighting that no real leadership ever emerges, so they never figure out what their actual demands are. They're good at producing public backlash and getting brands to take down their content, but not much else.