July 28th, 2024

Nasa nears decision on what to do with Boeing's Starliner spacecraft

NASA is deciding on Boeing's Starliner spacecraft after significant test flight issues. Astronauts have exceeded their planned duration due to propulsion problems. Backup plans with SpaceX are considered for safe return.

Read original articleLink Icon
Nasa nears decision on what to do with Boeing's Starliner spacecraft

NASA is approaching a decision regarding Boeing's Starliner spacecraft, which has encountered significant issues during its test flight. Astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams have been aboard the spacecraft for 51 days, exceeding their planned duration due to problems with the propulsion system, including overheating thrusters and helium leaks. NASA and Boeing are focused on ensuring the astronauts can return safely on Starliner, although backup plans involving a SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft have been considered. The Starliner mission, which launched on June 5, is crucial for establishing operational flights to the International Space Station (ISS).

NASA has extended the test flight to conduct further evaluations and gain confidence in the spacecraft's safety. Recent tests have revealed that some thrusters are experiencing reduced thrust, which is concerning for the return journey. Engineers are investigating the integrity of a Teflon seal in the thruster's oxidizer valve, which has shown signs of deformation. The spacecraft's thrusters are not required while docked at the ISS, but their performance is critical for undocking and reentry.

NASA aims to complete the mission with Starliner, as it is designed for crewed operations. Once certified, Starliner will join SpaceX's Crew Dragon in providing transportation to the ISS, enhancing the capabilities of NASA's commercial crew program.

Link Icon 9 comments
By @dredmorbius - 3 months
Among other concerns: apparently Nasa would like to determine the cause of the glitches. Much of the evidence would burn up on reentry, so remaining docked at the ISS is the only way to conduct forensics, despite a less-than-ideal environment.

(I'd picked this up recently in a podcast discussing Starliner.)

By @stickfigure - 3 months
I'm curious why they didn't do an unmanned live test, like SpaceX did with Crew Dragon? I'm reminded of the old adage, "never fly in a plane with a tail number less than 10". Is it just the expense? I presume we're past the point where we need humans to drive the thing.

The long delays on the ground indicated a high level of unexpected behavior. Not what you want in rocket systems.

By @credit_guy - 3 months
This is the best possible outcome. You don't want people to die, but you want the SLS to fail to such a degree that NASA can overcome the Congress pressure and ditch it.

That's the Goldilocks of failure. We are lucky.

By @fabian2k - 3 months
I was pretty surprised that they didn't test the hardware in that way even before flying it the first time. It looks like this issue is clearly reproducible on the ground with partial integration, not even the full spacecraft.
By @tjpnz - 3 months
Looks like Boeing will be doing another unmanned flight test at their expense. It would be foolish for NASA to certify the vehicle for future manned missions if they can't demonstrate the overheating issue is solved.
By @maples37 - 3 months
> There may also be a way to overcome the overheating problem by changing insulation on the doghouses or by software adjustments to fire the thrusters less often.

Ah yes, working around a hardware design issue via a software update. That's never caused issues for Boeing before!

By @sandworm101 - 3 months
Indecision is the problem. If they lack confidence in the craft, organize a rescue. Bring the boeing craft back on autopilot, which if not possible now could be arranged give time. The net result would be to demonstrate innovation and flexibility in space. Not a great day for boeing but a huge PR day for Nasa and SpaceX. It would be a mini Apollo 13 moment, absent the risk. With the ISS's time limited, Nasa needs to portray confidence and an ability to lead. This indecision comes off as weak.