SQLite vs. PostgreSQL
SQLite is ideal for simple, self-hosted projects with low latency, while PostgreSQL is better for applications needing advanced features and geographical distribution. The choice depends on project requirements.
Read original article
SQLite and PostgreSQL are two popular database options, each with its strengths and weaknesses. SQLite is often sufficient for many software projects, especially in self-hosted environments, due to its file-based architecture that allows for virtually zero latency between the application and the database. It simplifies backup processes since it operates as a single file, making it easy to manage. However, SQLite lacks built-in support for materialized views and has limitations in replication capabilities, which can be a drawback for applications requiring geographical distribution.
On the other hand, PostgreSQL offers robust features such as native support for materialized views and easier replication, making it suitable for applications that need to reduce latency across different locations. While PostgreSQL may introduce slightly more management complexity, it is still relatively easy to set up.
In summary, choose SQLite for projects prioritizing simplicity, low latency, and self-hosting, while PostgreSQL is preferable for applications needing geographical distribution and advanced features like materialized views. Ultimately, the choice may also depend on personal preference if neither factor is critical to the project. Both databases are effective options depending on the specific requirements of the application.
Related
Graph-Based Ceramics
The article discusses managing ceramic glazes, introducing a custom app. It compares Firebase and Supabase databases, opting for Supabase's better data modeling. Instant database is explored for a hybrid solution.
Just Use Postgres for Everything
The blog post advocates for using PostgreSQL extensively in tech stacks to simplify development, improve productivity, and reduce complexity. It highlights benefits like scalability, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, promoting a consolidated approach.
First Contact with SQLite
The article explores surprising aspects of SQLite, like limitations in altering columns and data types. It notes the recent jsonb support and handling date/time values, praising SQLite's streaming features but favoring PostgreSQL.
Gotchas with SQLite in Production
SQLite is popular for web apps but has limitations like single-threaded access, network challenges, and constraints in concurrency and transactions. Consider alternatives like MySQL for complex scenarios.
SQLite: 35% Faster Than the Filesystem
SQLite outperforms traditional file I/O by achieving 35% faster reads of small blobs and using 20% less disk space for 10-kilobyte blobs, despite some latency issues in specific scenarios.
2 comments- forgetting to use STRICT
- realising you actually did need complicated concurrency options like SKIP LOCKED or multiple writers
- discovering you need to add a read-only user for an analytics tool and suddenly everything becomes a lot harder because SQLite doesn't do networks or replicas or users
There are also certain things that have workarounds but aren't nice to work with, like FULL OUTER JOIN or ALTER TABLE.
Related
Graph-Based Ceramics
The article discusses managing ceramic glazes, introducing a custom app. It compares Firebase and Supabase databases, opting for Supabase's better data modeling. Instant database is explored for a hybrid solution.
Just Use Postgres for Everything
The blog post advocates for using PostgreSQL extensively in tech stacks to simplify development, improve productivity, and reduce complexity. It highlights benefits like scalability, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, promoting a consolidated approach.
First Contact with SQLite
The article explores surprising aspects of SQLite, like limitations in altering columns and data types. It notes the recent jsonb support and handling date/time values, praising SQLite's streaming features but favoring PostgreSQL.
Gotchas with SQLite in Production
SQLite is popular for web apps but has limitations like single-threaded access, network challenges, and constraints in concurrency and transactions. Consider alternatives like MySQL for complex scenarios.
SQLite: 35% Faster Than the Filesystem
SQLite outperforms traditional file I/O by achieving 35% faster reads of small blobs and using 20% less disk space for 10-kilobyte blobs, despite some latency issues in specific scenarios.