July 28th, 2024

Show HN: How I wrote a LaTeX paper without writing any LaTeX

A new model explains non-linear metabolic scaling in small cells, revealing distinct patterns for prokaryotes and eukaryotes, emphasizing the balance between reaction velocity and molecular transport efficiency.

Read original articleLink Icon
AppreciationFrustrationCuriosity
Show HN: How I wrote a LaTeX paper without writing any LaTeX

Metabolic scaling is a crucial aspect of biology, particularly in understanding how metabolic rates vary with organism size. A new model has been proposed to explain the non-linear scaling of metabolic rates in small life forms, specifically cells smaller than 10^-8 m³. This model focuses on optimizing the power output from enzyme-catalyzed reactions by balancing the volume allocated for reaction velocity and molecular movement. For cells smaller than 10^-17 m³, metabolic power is generated through diffusion, which leads to a dilution of enzyme concentration as cell volume increases. In contrast, larger cells depend on the bulk flow of cytoplasm facilitated by molecular motors.

The study reveals that metabolic scaling varies significantly across different size ranges, with smaller organisms exhibiting super-linear scaling and larger ones approaching a 3/4 power law. The model integrates thermodynamic principles to describe the trade-offs between reaction volume and transport volume, predicting that optimal enzyme concentrations decrease as cell size increases. This relationship aligns with empirical data on protein concentration scaling with cell size.

The findings suggest that the metabolic rates of prokaryotes and eukaryotes follow distinct scaling patterns, influenced by physical constraints and the need for efficient transport mechanisms. The model provides a comprehensive framework for understanding metabolic scaling across various life forms, highlighting the complexity of biological systems and the necessity for tailored approaches to study metabolic processes in small organisms.

Related

ESM3, EsmGFP, and EvolutionaryScale

ESM3, EsmGFP, and EvolutionaryScale

EvolutionaryScale introduces ESM3, a language model simulating 500 million years of evolution. ESM3 designs proteins with atomic precision, including esmGFP, a novel fluorescent protein, showcasing its potential for innovative protein engineering.

Brain size riddle solved as humans exceed evolutionary trend

Brain size riddle solved as humans exceed evolutionary trend

A study in Nature Ecology & Evolution reveals that the largest animals may not have proportionally bigger brains. Humans defy this trend, evolving exceptionally large brains compared to other mammals. The research clarifies brain-body size relationships, challenging previous assumptions.

First cell-free system in which genetic information and metabolism work together

First cell-free system in which genetic information and metabolism work together

Researchers at Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology developed a cell-free system merging genetic information and metabolism. The innovative Pure system and Cetch cycle cooperate to produce enzymes and organic molecules autonomously, showing promise for sustainable synthetic biology and energy production.

Biological Circuit Design by Caltech

Biological Circuit Design by Caltech

The document reviews biological circuit design, covering gene expression principles, feedback mechanisms, oscillatory behavior, and spatial pattern formation, while providing technical appendices for mathematical solutions and simulations.

The Physics of Cold Water May Have Jump-Started Complex Life

The Physics of Cold Water May Have Jump-Started Complex Life

Research by Carl Simpson suggests that frigid "Snowball Earth" conditions may have driven the evolution of multicellular life by increasing seawater viscosity, prompting single-celled organisms to form larger, coordinated groups.

AI: What people are saying
The comments reflect a mix of feedback and suggestions regarding the new model and its application in scientific writing and tools.
  • Users express appreciation for the work and its potential utility in academic settings.
  • There are requests for enhanced features in the editor, such as image annotation and better integration with existing tools.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of current formats like PDF for information transfer and reproducibility.
  • Some commenters advocate for open-source elements to encourage wider adoption.
  • There is a call for a shift towards more thoughtful, slower scientific writing rather than faster production.
Link Icon 16 comments
By @jopizio - 9 months
Very nice work. I'll definitely play around with it. For the use case of a digital lab notebook, it would be nice to be able to annotate (superimpose drawings, highlight, etc.) images and pdfs directly in the editor. This would be even more powerful if such annotations could be grouped or locked, so that their position relative to the annotated image remains fixed. This is something that all other note taking apps either miss entirely or implement poorly (or maybe there's something else out there that does this well?). Is this possible in Stempad, or are you considering adding such functionality?
By @dotancohen - 9 months
Nice work, the video looks terrific.

Just so you know, the vast majority (I'd say everything but molecules) of this is already possible with Org Mode, and can be done just as quickly with Evil (VIM keybindings). That said, I'm sure that people will love this.

By @i_am_proteus - 9 months
Interesting project. It seems like your functionality, other than the browser-based editor and renderer, overlaps with Quarto (https://quarto.org/)

I use a tiled text editor/quarto preview browser pane with a lot of success for scientific notes.

By @manuel_w - 9 months
Since you are keen on feedback:

A LaTeX using collegue I forwarded this to objected that you need to approve latex keywords (\alpha) and can't just keep on typing.

Not much of a LaTeX user myself, so just forwarding the feedback as is.

By @troops_h8r - 9 months
This is really cool, I gave it a try this morning at work. Unfortunately, as much as I like it, I can't see myself using this regularly precisely because it's a webapp. I'm sure there's a lot of folks out there that would love it though.

Perhaps it's just a personal preference, but I'm just reticent to fall into the habit of using something which requires an internet connection, you know?

By @owenpalmer - 9 months
This is a cool app, but I have one major criticism. It's really, really slow.

If I'm going to be using something for writing or notes, I needs to be snappy. You need to do some profiling and debug the lag. Other than that, great work!

By @iknownthing - 9 months
Is it possible to embed the stempad editor in something like a react app?
By @forgotpwd16 - 9 months
In resulted pdf there're weird spacings all over the document. Figures are referenced by manually indexing them rather by name. No hyperlinks. Equations have no numbering. Some equations/formulas in text aren't using math mode. (For units better use the siunitx package.) Bibliography is basically simple text rather generated, making it hard to switch to other styles.

Regarding the editor, seems math and text cannot be written together. Copying math and pasting to text field results in pasting LaTeX code.

Now if just said made this because wanted to wouldn't have mentioned it, but as you provide a reasoning, LyX (LaTeX frontend) and TeXmacs (not frontend but can export to LaTeX) provide a way to get LaTeX documents without writing LaTeX.

Overall the site can function as cool math-enabled notepad but (for now at least) seems hard to use it as platform to author papers.

By @GTP - 9 months
This could become useful for me in the short-term future, thabk you for sharing!
By @curiousgibbon - 9 months
Have you heard of pandoc?
By @arsalanb - 9 months
Is the Python code executing via Pyodide in the browser?
By @tomtranter - 9 months
My biggest frustration as an academic was reproducibility of papers I was reading. The pdf is such a useless medium for information transfer and the academic publishing industry is a complete racket where all the value is generated by the authors and reviewers who work for free and have to pay (in most cases) to have their work accessible freely to the public. I would love to see this turn into a default way to publish papers
By @hruzgar - 9 months
if you want this to go main stream, you have to at least make some parts of it open source
By @rrnechmech - 9 months
We don't need faster scientific writing

We need slower scientific writing.

Edit: While I understand policy involved, apologies, I'd contend 'shallow'. Not lengthy? Sure. But the point was made enough @kbk et al. got it