July 29th, 2024

Low-income homes drop Internet service after Congress kills discount program

The termination of the Affordable Connectivity Program has caused a significant decline in Internet subscriptions among low-income households, with Charter Communications losing 154,000 subscribers in Q2 2024.

Read original articleLink Icon
Low-income homes drop Internet service after Congress kills discount program

The termination of the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) in the U.S. has led to a significant drop in Internet service subscriptions among low-income households. Charter Communications reported a loss of 154,000 Internet subscribers in the second quarter of 2024, primarily attributed to customers canceling their service after the $30 monthly discount ended in May. Approximately 100,000 of these subscribers had been receiving the discount, which sometimes made their Internet service free. The Biden administration had sought $6 billion to continue funding the ACP, but Congress did not allocate additional resources, with Republican lawmakers criticizing the program for benefiting households that already had broadband access.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had warned that the discontinuation of the discounts would likely lead to reduced Internet access, as a survey indicated that 77% of participating households would either change their plan or drop service entirely once the subsidies expired. Charter's earnings report highlighted that the loss of subscribers was a stark contrast to the previous year, where they had gained 70,000 customers. Although Charter has made retention offers to former ACP recipients, the company's CEO expressed concern about the long-term ability of low-income customers to pay for Internet service without new subsidies. Additionally, the FCC's Lifeline program, which provides further discounts, is also facing uncertainty due to a recent court ruling questioning the constitutionality of the Universal Service Fund.

Related

AT&T can't hang up on landline phone customers, California agency rules

AT&T can't hang up on landline phone customers, California agency rules

The CPUC rejected AT&T's request to end landline phone obligations, emphasizing customer protection. AT&T's application lacked replacement provider evidence. CPUC considers COLR rule changes, while Marin County opposes AT&T's legislation.

Access to broadband internet causally linked to reduction in suicides

Access to broadband internet causally linked to reduction in suicides

Broadband internet access growth in the US from 2000 to 2008 correlates with a 1.01% decrease in suicides per county, improved mental and physical health, lower poverty, and unemployment rates, benefiting the working-age population.

FCC closes "final loopholes" that keep prison phone prices exorbitantly high

FCC closes "final loopholes" that keep prison phone prices exorbitantly high

The FCC voted to lower prison phone call price caps, halving interstate rates and introducing caps for intrastate calls. Changes effective Jan 2025 for all prisons and Apr 2025 for smaller jails.

FCC votes unanimously to dramatically limit prison telecom rates

FCC votes unanimously to dramatically limit prison telecom rates

The FCC voted to lower communication costs for incarcerated individuals, reducing per-minute rates and establishing new caps, potentially saving families $500 million yearly. Advocates praise the decision for promoting well-being and addressing financial burdens.

ISPs seeking government handouts try to avoid offering low-cost broadband

ISPs seeking government handouts try to avoid offering low-cost broadband

ISPs are contesting a requirement to offer low-cost broadband plans under a $42.45 billion government program, arguing it imposes illegal rate regulations, while some states have approved plans including affordable options.

Link Icon 9 comments
By @janalsncm - 6 months
> an FCC survey found that 77 percent of participating households would change their plan or drop Internet service entirely once the discounts expired

I see a huge difference between downgrading and cancelling. If someone gave me a subsidy I might upgrade to a better plan, but I already have internet.

On the other hand, it’s pretty ridiculous that we can afford trillions in corporate handouts but can’t give people internet in the 21st century.

By @mdanger007 - 6 months
With class curriculums increasingly going digital, our most at risk students are given Chromebooks but are cut off at home because of the 'wasteful' internet. Suppose you're a teacher, already tight on time, and your lowest performing students say they can't get on to Google classroom because their internet was cut off: do you have to create a separate lesson plan or cut Chromebooks out of your lessons entirely?
By @trappist - 6 months
This was a subsidy paid to participating providers in high-cost areas to support the discount. Charter, a participating provider, said it lost customers when the discount ended. That is not the same as saying those customers lost access to the internet.
By @mikeInAlaska - 6 months
Tethering to 5G and LTE enabled cell phones in this situation is very common. They are certainly getting rid of their broadband fiber, cable or DSL before their discounted cell services.
By @p1esk - 6 months
I’m guessing most of these poor people have smartphones with internet connection, so they haven’t really lost their internet access, have they?
By @hindsightbias - 6 months
It's not surprising Charter doesn't pay the lobbyists enough or make big enough campaign contributions. But I do wonder what Charter does actually spend their money on.
By @chung8123 - 6 months
I wish we just used NASA and the FCC dollars to build out our own Starlink. Subsidies for big companies should come with equity. These numbers we are talking about between the rural build out and the low-income subsidies probably come close to our own system.
By @fxd123 - 6 months
This is just a subsidy for big ISPs. Good riddance
By @metadat - 6 months
If someone can't afford $30-50/mo for Internet, how does one pay rent or mobile phone bills?

I am sympathetic to low income folks, and also genuinely curious how one affords rent when it's ~20x the Internet bill ($1300-2500/mo for a modest residence). Roommates? Can everyone chip in for Internet?

Living on the edge is rough by modern standards.