July 30th, 2024

Our Users Deserve a Bill of Rights

The author critiques the tech industry's neglect of end users, advocating for a "User Bill of Rights" to ensure accountability and balance between innovation and stability in software development.

Read original articleLink Icon
Our Users Deserve a Bill of Rights

The author expresses frustration with the tech industry’s treatment of end users, arguing that they often suffer from the consequences of software failures without any compensation or consideration from providers. The piece reflects on recent incidents, such as outages affecting Delta Airlines, highlighting a lack of accountability among tech companies. The author critiques the frequent updates and changes in user interfaces that disrupt established workflows, suggesting that these changes are often unnecessary and driven by developers' need to justify their roles rather than genuine user benefit. The author proposes the idea of a "User Bill of Rights" to better protect users, although acknowledges the complexity of defining such rights without hindering software development. The discussion raises questions about compensation for software failures, especially concerning free software, and emphasizes the need for a balance between innovation and stability in software development. The author concludes with a call for the industry to recognize the difference between meaningful innovation and disruptive change, expressing hope for a future where user rights are prioritized. The piece serves as a critique of the current state of the tech industry and a proposal for a more user-centered approach moving forward.

Related

Tech's accountability tantrum is pathetic

Tech's accountability tantrum is pathetic

Silicon Valley tech giants criticized for lack of accountability and ethical behavior. Companies like Uber, Amazon, Google, and individuals like Elon Musk prioritize innovation over laws and ethics. Resistance to oversight and lobbying against regulations noted. Importance of accountability stressed to prevent societal harm.

The Programmers' Identity Crisis: how do we use our powers for 'good'?

The Programmers' Identity Crisis: how do we use our powers for 'good'?

Reflection on ethical dilemmas faced by programmers, discussing challenges of working for companies with questionable practices. Emphasizes rationalizing involvement with conflicting values in tech industry and suggests navigating dilemmas collectively for positive change.

Never Update Anything

Never Update Anything

The article critiques frequent software updates, citing time constraints, confusion over update types, and companies pushing paid upgrades. It highlights challenges and issues caused by updates, questioning their necessity.

Let's blame the dev who pressed "Deploy"

Let's blame the dev who pressed "Deploy"

The article addresses accountability in software engineering post-incidents like the CrowdStrike outage. It criticizes blaming developers and advocates for holding leaders accountable to address systemic issues. It emphasizes respecting software engineers' expertise.

Technology's grip on modern life is pushing us down a dimly lit path

Technology's grip on modern life is pushing us down a dimly lit path

A global technology outage caused by a CrowdStrike software update exposed vulnerabilities in interconnected systems, prompting calls for a balance between innovation and security to enhance digital resilience.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @itfossil - 3 months
I think the one thing that really ticks me off about this industry more than any other is the fact that we constantly treat our end users very poorly. Now those of you reading this are likely of one of two minds: Some amount of you think this is a very true statement and the rest of you think its complete and utter bollocks. Which group are you in?
By @MrJohz - 3 months
To a certain extent, there are bills of rights already - consumer protection legislation exists, and is getting better at targeting badly-made software.

Consider the EU's GDPR regulation, which forces company to handle users' private data with care. That covers everything from not selling your users' data on the open market, to paying fines of your poor security practices mean that users' confidential details get hacked. Or more recently, the CRA and PLD, which together ensure that people selling software are liable when that software causes problems - when IoT devices are sold without security, or when your phone can no longer accept security updates a couple of years after you bought it, and so on.

This is for the EU, but I know similar legislation has been implemented in parts of the US.