Fast Multidimensional Matrix Multiplication on CPU from Scratch
The article examines multidimensional matrix multiplication performance on CPUs using Numpy and C++. It discusses optimization techniques and challenges in replicating Numpy's efficiency, emphasizing the importance of memory access patterns.
Read original articleThe article discusses the performance of multidimensional matrix multiplication on a CPU, specifically using Numpy and C++. It highlights that Numpy can multiply two 1024x1024 matrices in approximately 8 milliseconds on a 4-core Intel CPU, achieving around 18 FLOPs per core per cycle. This performance is attributed to the use of optimized BLAS libraries, such as Intel's MKL, which implement functions like SGEMM for efficient matrix operations. The author explores the challenges of replicating this performance using plain C++, noting that a naive implementation takes significantly longer.
The article details various optimization techniques, including compiler flags, register accumulation, and cache-aware loop reordering, which can drastically reduce computation time. For instance, a cache-aware implementation improved performance to 89 milliseconds, demonstrating the importance of memory access patterns in matrix multiplication. The author emphasizes that while achieving performance close to Numpy's implementation is challenging, understanding these optimizations is crucial for developing efficient numerical algorithms.
Ultimately, the article serves as a guide for programmers interested in enhancing matrix multiplication performance in C++, illustrating the impact of hardware architecture and optimization strategies on computational efficiency. The author concludes that while their implementation achieves 9 FLOPs per core per cycle, it is not intended to compete with established BLAS libraries but rather to provide insights into performance optimization techniques.
Related
AMD MI300x GPUs with GEMM tuning improves throughput and latency by up to 7.2x
Nscale explores GEMM tuning impact on AI model optimization, emphasizing throughput and latency benefits. Fine-tuning parameters and algorithms significantly boost speed and efficiency, especially on AMD GPUs, showcasing up to 7.2x throughput improvement.
Beating NumPy's matrix multiplication in 150 lines of C code
Aman Salykov's blog delves into high-performance matrix multiplication in C, surpassing NumPy with OpenBLAS on AMD Ryzen 7700 CPU. Scalable, portable code with OpenMP, targeting Intel Core and AMD Zen CPUs. Discusses BLAS, CPU performance limits, and hints at GPU optimization.
Beating NumPy's matrix multiplication in 150 lines of C code
Aman Salykov's blog explores high-performance matrix multiplication in C, surpassing NumPy with OpenBLAS on AMD Ryzen 7700 CPU. Scalable, portable code optimized for modern CPUs with FMA3 and AVX instructions, parallelized with OpenMP for scalability and performance. Discusses matrix multiplication's significance in neural networks, BLAS libraries' role, CPU performance limits, and optimizing implementations without low-level assembly. Mentions fast matrix multiplication tutorials and upcoming GPU optimization post.
Beating NumPy matrix multiplication in 150 lines of C
Aman Salykov's blog explores high-performance matrix multiplication in C, surpassing NumPy with OpenBLAS on AMD Ryzen 7700 CPU. Scalable, portable code optimized for modern CPUs with OpenMP directives for parallelization. Discusses BLAS libraries, CPU performance limits, and matrix multiplication optimization.
How to Optimize a CUDA Matmul Kernel for CuBLAS-Like Performance: A Worklog
The author optimizes a CUDA matrix multiplication kernel, achieving 93.7% of cuBLAS performance through techniques like memory coalescing and shared memory caching, emphasizing GPU performance in deep learning applications.
Source code: https://github.com/arekpaterek/Faster_SGEMM_CUDA
size tflops_cublas tflops_my diff gpu
4096² 50.8-50.9 61.8 +21% 4090
6144² 55.3 59.8 +8% 4090
8192² 56.3-56.5 67.1 +19% 4090
12288² 53.7 66.7 +24% 4090
16384² 53.6 66.7 +24% 4090
4096² 28.7-28.8 32.5 +13% 4070ts
4096² 3.8-4.3 6.7 +56-76% T4
250GFLOP/core is no joke - He also cross-compared to an M1 Pro, that when not using the secret matrix coprocessor achieves effectively the same vector throughput, a decade later...
Related
AMD MI300x GPUs with GEMM tuning improves throughput and latency by up to 7.2x
Nscale explores GEMM tuning impact on AI model optimization, emphasizing throughput and latency benefits. Fine-tuning parameters and algorithms significantly boost speed and efficiency, especially on AMD GPUs, showcasing up to 7.2x throughput improvement.
Beating NumPy's matrix multiplication in 150 lines of C code
Aman Salykov's blog delves into high-performance matrix multiplication in C, surpassing NumPy with OpenBLAS on AMD Ryzen 7700 CPU. Scalable, portable code with OpenMP, targeting Intel Core and AMD Zen CPUs. Discusses BLAS, CPU performance limits, and hints at GPU optimization.
Beating NumPy's matrix multiplication in 150 lines of C code
Aman Salykov's blog explores high-performance matrix multiplication in C, surpassing NumPy with OpenBLAS on AMD Ryzen 7700 CPU. Scalable, portable code optimized for modern CPUs with FMA3 and AVX instructions, parallelized with OpenMP for scalability and performance. Discusses matrix multiplication's significance in neural networks, BLAS libraries' role, CPU performance limits, and optimizing implementations without low-level assembly. Mentions fast matrix multiplication tutorials and upcoming GPU optimization post.
Beating NumPy matrix multiplication in 150 lines of C
Aman Salykov's blog explores high-performance matrix multiplication in C, surpassing NumPy with OpenBLAS on AMD Ryzen 7700 CPU. Scalable, portable code optimized for modern CPUs with OpenMP directives for parallelization. Discusses BLAS libraries, CPU performance limits, and matrix multiplication optimization.
How to Optimize a CUDA Matmul Kernel for CuBLAS-Like Performance: A Worklog
The author optimizes a CUDA matrix multiplication kernel, achieving 93.7% of cuBLAS performance through techniques like memory coalescing and shared memory caching, emphasizing GPU performance in deep learning applications.