You Can't Spell WebRTC Without RCE – Part 1
Ian Dupont's blog post examines vulnerabilities in the Signal messaging app related to WebRTC, emphasizing the need for security research and detailing the exploitation of its protocols for potential attacks.
Read original articleThe blog post by Ian Dupont discusses the vulnerabilities associated with the Signal messaging app, particularly focusing on its use of WebRTC for real-time communication. As secure messaging apps gain popularity, the need for thorough research into their security becomes critical, especially given past exploits like Pegasus spyware. The series aims to simplify the complex task of researching messaging apps and mobile exploitation, starting with an investigation into WebRTC, which is integral to many messaging applications.
The first part of the series outlines the structure of WebRTC and its protocols, including RTP and RTCP, which handle audio and video data transmission. Signal uses a public fork of WebRTC, known as RingRTC, which has specific modifications for its implementation. The author emphasizes the importance of understanding these protocols to identify potential vulnerabilities.
The post details the process of injecting synthetic vulnerabilities into Signal's WebRTC implementation, aiming to demonstrate how these vulnerabilities can be exploited. The author plans to remove certain mitigations that prevent premature parsing of RTP packets, thereby creating a 0-click attack surface. The research will also cover the setup of a local research environment and the use of tools like Frida for mobile exploitation.
Overall, the series intends to provide foundational knowledge for security researchers interested in mobile app vulnerabilities, particularly within the context of Signal and WebRTC, while also offering practical insights into the exploitation process.
Related
Signal under fire for storing encryption keys in plaintext
Signal's desktop app stores encryption keys in plaintext, risking data theft. Users' security responsibility increases post-data arrival. Despite criticism, Signal hasn't fixed the issue. Caution advised for desktop app usage.
Signal under fire for storing encryption keys in plaintext
Signal's desktop app faces scrutiny for storing encryption keys in plaintext, risking data theft. Despite past criticisms, no changes have been made. Users express concerns over security implications, echoing issues in WhatsApp and iMessage.
Universal Code Execution by Chaining Messages in Browser Extensions
Researchers demonstrate universal code execution in browser extensions by exploiting messaging APIs, bypassing security measures. Vulnerabilities in extensions can compromise millions of users, allowing access to sensitive data and enabling arbitrary command execution.
AT&T Breach Shows Why RCS Can't Be Trusted and the Cons of iOS 18 Adding Support
The article criticizes AT&T data breach, questions RCS lack of encryption, and Apple's support for RCS in iOS 18. It emphasizes the need for end-to-end encryption in messaging services for user privacy and security.
What Does It Mean to Be a Signal Competitor?
The article outlines criteria for messaging apps to compete with Signal, emphasizing open source, end-to-end encryption, and secure implementation. It warns against prioritizing features over user privacy and security.
A messaging app has almost all the same security concerns as a browser, so the recommendations here apply: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/browserenginekit
I assume Signal uses a different implementation, but I'm sadly not surprised there are security issues lurking inside it.
This bit at the beginning made me chuckle, though:
> It’s another average Friday morning and my iPhone shows 705 unread Signal messages
I feel like I'm doing communications wrong... if I wake up and find 20 unread messages across all my chat apps, that's on the high side for me.
So, it is a build instruction.
They took Signal-webrtc & added a vulnerability to it.
Maybe maybe maybe there's some other means to exploit the lack of time check, but this feels like such a massive & overwhelmingly staked out nothing burger.
Related
Signal under fire for storing encryption keys in plaintext
Signal's desktop app stores encryption keys in plaintext, risking data theft. Users' security responsibility increases post-data arrival. Despite criticism, Signal hasn't fixed the issue. Caution advised for desktop app usage.
Signal under fire for storing encryption keys in plaintext
Signal's desktop app faces scrutiny for storing encryption keys in plaintext, risking data theft. Despite past criticisms, no changes have been made. Users express concerns over security implications, echoing issues in WhatsApp and iMessage.
Universal Code Execution by Chaining Messages in Browser Extensions
Researchers demonstrate universal code execution in browser extensions by exploiting messaging APIs, bypassing security measures. Vulnerabilities in extensions can compromise millions of users, allowing access to sensitive data and enabling arbitrary command execution.
AT&T Breach Shows Why RCS Can't Be Trusted and the Cons of iOS 18 Adding Support
The article criticizes AT&T data breach, questions RCS lack of encryption, and Apple's support for RCS in iOS 18. It emphasizes the need for end-to-end encryption in messaging services for user privacy and security.
What Does It Mean to Be a Signal Competitor?
The article outlines criteria for messaging apps to compete with Signal, emphasizing open source, end-to-end encryption, and secure implementation. It warns against prioritizing features over user privacy and security.