August 5th, 2024

Andy Warhol's lost Amiga art found

Lost digital art by Andy Warhol, created on an Amiga 1000, has resurfaced after 39 years, highlighting its historical significance and Warhol's unique style despite technological challenges during its creation.

Read original articleLink Icon
DisappointmentExcitementConfusion
Andy Warhol's lost Amiga art found

After 39 years, lost digital art by Andy Warhol, created on an Amiga 1000 computer, has resurfaced and is now for sale. Warhol was commissioned by Commodore in 1985 to demonstrate the computer's artistic capabilities, producing notable works including a self-portrait and a portrait of Debbie Harry. The rediscovery was facilitated by Jeff Bruette, a former Commodore engineer who not only preserved a signed floppy disk containing eight images from the event but also taught Warhol how to use the computer. Despite the rudimentary nature of the digital art by today's standards, Warhol's use of color and technique reflected his unique style. The images were initially thought to be lost, but Bruette's collection has shed light on Warhol's experimentation with digital art. The original demonstration was fraught with challenges, as Warhol struggled with the technology, leading to inconsistent results. Commodore's marketing missed opportunities to capitalize on Warhol's connection to the Amiga, and the recent findings highlight both the historical significance of Warhol's digital art and the importance of preserving such works for future appreciation.

- Andy Warhol's lost Amiga art has been found after 39 years.

- Jeff Bruette, a former Commodore engineer, played a key role in preserving the art.

- Warhol's digital creations reflect his unique style despite technological limitations.

- The original demonstration of the Amiga was challenging for Warhol, impacting the quality of his work.

- The rediscovery emphasizes the historical significance of Warhol's digital art.

AI: What people are saying
The resurfacing of Andy Warhol's lost digital art has generated a variety of comments reflecting on its significance and context.
  • Many commenters express disappointment that the actual images from the lost disk are not displayed in the article or linked sources.
  • There is discussion about the historical context of Warhol's work with the Amiga 1000 and its technological limitations.
  • Some users question the definition of "original digital copy" and the methods used to recover the artwork.
  • Comments highlight the longevity of floppy disks compared to other storage media, noting their durability over time.
  • Several users reflect on Warhol's artistic legacy and the perception of his work in the art world.
Link Icon 28 comments
By @virgulino - 2 months
"The World Premiere of the Amiga (1985, Andy Warhol, Debbie Harry): Possibly wanting to one-up the Apple Macintosh launch in 1984, the Amiga 1000 debuted at a black-tie event held at the Vivian Beaumont Theater at Lincoln Center in New York City on July 23rd, 1985. (...)"

Warhol paints Debbie on stage:

https://youtu.be/_QST1ZAJ29o?t=719

By @dec0dedab0de - 2 months
Last year I was really into non-ebay auctions. Basically traditional auctions that were also online.

I got super excited when I saw a Commodore 64 was coming up soon, until I noticed the starting price was around $100,000. It was actually for a collection of unreleased digital art from Andy Warhol, and they were throwing in the computer for free. Apparently there is a lot of it that they still haven’t sorted through.

I don’t know anything about art, I was just bummed it wasn’t a cheap retro computer.

By @cellularmitosis - 2 months
> and a signed floppy disk containing eight images that Andy Warhol created that day. He said he’s had them on display in his home for about 39 years.

Shout out to the longevity of floppy disks as a storage medium. I was quite disappointed when I discovered many of my writable CD's started failing at the 15 to 20 year mark.

By @tetris11 - 2 months
I live in the hope that I'll always be tech-literate, even into my retirement, but I'm beginning to suspect that no matter how generalist I try to be with my skillset, the mind will specialize as it gets older in few particular ways and no matter how skilled I am in field A B or C, it just will not translate to field X Y or Z.
By @ezekiel68 - 2 months
God, this makes me so happy. I well remember that self-portrait on the cover of Amiga Magazine back in ~1986. I was so excited about the platform, the technology, and the possibilities.
By @PaulHoule - 2 months
I enjoy Warhol's silkscreen prints. You can pick one up on Ebay for about $100 or so and it is pretty rare for a piece by such a prominent artists to be affordable but that's what Warhol's market was.

With that process you can also get spot colors that are not in the CYMK space, for instance last week I struggled with printing an image of Rudbeckia flowers until I understood that the RGB version of that yellow (at the edge of saturation so probably not as saturated as the real thing) doesn't exist in CYMK which means if you don't modify the color to be in gamut the printer will do it for you -- probably not the way you want.

With spot color (say Pantone) I could get some ink mixed up that would color match the flower even better -- it was before Pantone but Warhol's spot colors were often like that. And of course his work with the Amiga is much in the style he's famous for.

By @ogou - 2 months
The lost Amiga art is never shown, in this article or any of the linked sources. The 9 images on that "lost" disk aren't actually displayed. The disk itself is the valuable object, kind of like Picasso signing a napkin. But, even the disk isn't shown. None of these articles say whether anybody tried reading the disk.
By @crb - 2 months
It wasn't lost. The guy who sat next to Warhol as he created it, has had it for the entirety of the intervening time. (That's some "provenance".)

The thing that Debbie Harry said she had one of two of was a /print/ of the images.

There's some more context here: https://pagesix.com/2024/07/29/lifestyle/long-lost-andy-warh...

By @dangan - 2 months
This guy missed the joke. Warhol is holding the mouse the same way a painter would hold a paintbrush: https://artofericwayne.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/vincen...
By @miles - 2 months
Neat to see a post here from Dave Farquhar's blog. His Optimizing Windows for Games, Graphics and Multimedia, published by O'Reilly at the turn of the century, was an early inspiration: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1565926773
By @swayvil - 2 months
Andy got mental about art. That is, thinking was an important step for him, in his process. He went far down that road.

Some artists don't do the mental thing so much. More of a conversation between just the hand and the beauty sense. Maybe a little mental, maybe no mental at all.

The non-mental approach is more fulfilling, imo. A better high and a better product. What beauty I can create in 5 minutes scribbling takes a year to almost-do the same in code.

(ok, the mental approach is pretty much just a big tease. It never really delivers. Lots of "neat" and "interesting" but it never really actually delivers the big punch. Sorry if that's harsh.)

All respect to Andy tho. And it's nice to know that he shared that particular path with us. I wonder if he ever dabbled in code.

By @greenhearth - 2 months
This is interesting and very cool news but the writer ruins it with some weird self-aggrandizing and a baffling comparison of himself to Warhol.

"The digital images Andy Warhol created are rudimentary by today’s standards, and in some ways, perhaps less ambitious then some of the thumbnails I create for my blog posts. But this was 39 years ago, and I have much better tools than he did."

Is this trolling? lol

By @thaanpaa - 2 months
The lost artwork was discovered almost exactly ten years ago, in 2014. Are there any new developments on this front? If the article contained anything new, I missed it.
By @omneity - 2 months
Really cool find, but what does “original digital copy” mean in this context?

Would a duplicated file count still? Would a screenshot (for argument’s sake) not count?

By @binary132 - 2 months
Reminds me of some kind of proto-vaporwave art
By @deorder - 2 months
From what I remember he used Deluxe Paint and the color cycle feature to change the color palette around.
By @empressplay - 2 months
See also this issue of Amiga World magazine (January 1986), with higher quality prints

https://archive.org/details/amiga-world-1986-01/mode/2up

By @ranger_danger - 2 months
> a series of images was recovered from disks

Does anyone know how exactly it was recovered? Or if raw dumps of the disks are available?

By @mvkel - 2 months
Now this is an NFT
By @Broere - 2 months
How do i know am dealing with a crypto Investment scam?

Paying a trading company funds to withdraw your profit is a pure scam.

Often payment’s demand is a scam.

Payment under pressure is a scam.

A well known special financial Adviser From Trust Guard Digital Recovery Service once made it known to the world that it actually takes nothing to carry out a job well known, making so much excuse at the middle of a contract or job just to demand for untold or unforeseen fees can result to scam at the end, these crypto scammers has no conscience to anyone who happens to be their victim, it is therefore wise for all to learn how to avoid such scam statism and their corning method, Trust guard digital recovery assets are always available to educate and help recovery lost assets, they are most trusted on the web with proofs of stolen funds recovery. for more info do reach out to trustguarddigitalassetsrecovery (AT) Aol com’’ and whats (APP) Number is Plus , one ,three ,four ,three ,three ,five ,three , two , three, five , six .. and be rest assured of a successful job well done.

By @breadwinner - 2 months
Warhol is one of those artists that leaves the layperson scratching their head... how did this guy's work get recognized as high falutin art?

For example, see Warhol's soup can: https://www.moma.org/collection/works/79809

By @fluoridation - 2 months
Isn't this sort of thing people would follow with the joke "someone just discovered filters in photoshop"? I'm reminded of AVGN's review of Plumbers don't Wear Ties.
By @t43562 - 2 months
Interesting how if anyone else created pictures like these we wouldn't really care.