August 7th, 2024

Streams, Calculational Proofs and Dafny

The article examines calculational proofs in Dafny, emphasizing streams, equality establishment through reasoning, stream creation functions, proof automation, and the uniqueness of solutions to restricted stream equations.

Read original articleLink Icon
Streams, Calculational Proofs and Dafny

The article discusses the use of calculational proofs in the context of the programming language Dafny, particularly focusing on streams and their properties. It illustrates how to establish equality between expressions using a chain of equalities, exemplified by the lemma that shows the equivalence of appending two repeated elements. The proof leverages inductive reasoning for lists and coinductive reasoning for streams, highlighting the unique solutions to restricted stream equations. The author presents functions for creating streams, such as natural numbers and repeated elements, and demonstrates how to prove that certain stream expressions are equal by satisfying the same restricted equations. The paper emphasizes the role of Dafny in automating the proof process, allowing users to focus on formulating the necessary lemmas. It concludes with a discussion on the uniqueness of fixed points in stream equations, showcasing how to prove that specific stream constructions yield the same results.

- The article explores calculational proofs in Dafny, focusing on streams and their properties.

- It demonstrates the use of inductive and coinductive reasoning in establishing equality between stream expressions.

- The author provides examples of functions for creating and manipulating streams.

- Dafny is highlighted for its ability to automate proof processes, simplifying the proof-writing experience.

- The uniqueness of solutions to restricted stream equations is a key theme in the discussion.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @User23 - 7 months
Watching Dafny develop has been wonderful. It’s taken a lot of good ideas from 50 years ago and pushed them into the present in modern incarnations.

The predicate transformer semantics (and descendants) approach to proving a program has some properties is far more accessible to the typical programmer than cracking that egg with the sledgehammer of the Calculus of Constructions.

I’ve been a huge fan of calculational proof styles for over a decade now, ever since I did a deep dive into the UT Austin EWD archive. Here[1] is his brief explanation, but to really appreciate the beauty of the method one has to dig deeper into the many practical applications also on that site.

I also recommend looking into Boogie and Z3 for those who are curious about how Dafny does what it does.

[1] https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~EWD/transcriptions/EWD13xx/EWD130...

By @giraffe_lady - 7 months
Dafny seems really interesting in its own right but every time I come across it I just want the story of its... logo? crest? mascot? https://dafny.org/images/dafny-logo.jpg
By @sn9 - 7 months
For anyone wanting to pick up Dafny (or just build some intuition around formal reasoning of code), this recent book is great: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262546232/program-proofs/