August 7th, 2024

Coq will be renamed into 'The Rocq Prover'

Coq, a formal proof management system for mathematical proofs and programming language certification, will be renamed "The Rocq Prover" by late 2024, with community support and a dedicated Stack Exchange site.

Read original articleLink Icon
Coq will be renamed into 'The Rocq Prover'

Coq is a formal proof management system that allows users to write mathematical definitions, algorithms, and theorems, facilitating the development of machine-checked proofs. It is utilized in various applications, including the certification of programming languages and the formalization of mathematical theorems. Users can access Coq through its Reference Manual and Standard Library, with tutorials and books recommended for beginners. Coq can be run directly in a browser using jsCoq, or installed on a local system. The Coq community is active, contributing to formal developments and tools, and engaging through forums and chat platforms. Coq is open-source, primarily developed by Inria, and encourages contributions from users in various forms, including financial support through the Coq Consortium. Recently, the Coq team announced plans to rename the software to "The Rocq Prover," with a new visual identity and website expected by the end of 2024, along with the first release of Rocq. Additionally, a Stack Exchange Q&A site for Proof Assistants has been established for users to ask and answer questions related to Coq.

- Coq is a formal proof management system used for mathematical proofs and programming language certification.

- The software will be renamed to "The Rocq Prover" with a new identity expected by late 2024.

- Users can run Coq in a browser or install it locally, with extensive community support available.

- Coq is open-source and encourages contributions from both academic and industrial users.

- A dedicated Stack Exchange site for Proof Assistants has been launched for community engagement.

Link Icon 15 comments
By @dgacmu - 5 months
I will say that as a professor who occasionally has to refer to this system in front of a bunch of (American) 18-24 year olds, I'm very grateful for this renaming.
By @michaelt - 5 months
Expanded details at https://coq.discourse.group/t/coq-community-survey-2022-resu...

I'm not part of the Coq community so I've got no strong opinions on this. But I do know I've often heard people saying GIMP could do with a better name.

By @mauricioc - 5 months
By @Cu3PO42 - 5 months
I have no strong opinion on renaming the project as such and conducting a survey was surely one of the better ways to handle that question. However, one thing in their evaluation of alternative names sprung out at me:

> No option receives more likes than dislikes.

So the new name was just "the least bad" option. Naming things is hard and getting a community to agree on a name is surely that much harder still, but I still find it a bit sad that the new name is not well-liked.

By @aeonik - 5 months
I pronounce "Coq" with back of my throat to make it a bit different from the word "Cock". Try to emulate the French accent a bit, and it ends of sounding almost like "Coke", but not quite.

That being said context matters too, I still refer to loading a round into a gun's chamber as cocking a gun.

I've never had an issue referencing the project's name in a professional environment, where most of my colleagues are unfamiliar with it.

By @kerkeslager - 5 months
This isn't a hill I'm willing to die on, but it's mildly annoying that people couldn't just grow up about this.
By @csneeky - 5 months
And what of the rooster mascot?
By @neilv - 5 months
Someone on HN pointed out a problem with a joke in the new name, but they got flagged. Basically, the new name looks like intentional innuendo wordplay related to the problem with the first name

We all appreciate various kinds of humor, in the right contexts.

But this software seems like something used in professional and academic contexts.

Including professional and academic contexts with a history of sometimes being unwelcoming to women. Who might not want to be reminded of old boys' club locker room phallic humor insensitivity throughout each day as they work.

So, the new name is going to seem like doubling-down, by those who didn't understand all the problems with the previous name, or didn't consider them problems.

I think this is one of those things we sometimes do out of lighthearted intention, with no harm intended, and only later realize and regret.

Now's a chance avert some harm and regret.

By @djtango - 5 months
Rocq au vin
By @dist-epoch - 5 months
> The Coq team has decided that Coq will be renamed into 'The Rocq Prover'

They have a typo on the side, it's `The Rocq Hard Prover`

By @sva_ - 5 months
Sounds like an AMD product.
By @aestetix - 5 months
I can't wait for someone to find a problem with this new name, and throw the entire project into disarray for another few years.