August 8th, 2024

The post-neoliberalism moment

The article examines the decline of neoliberalism and the Washington Consensus, highlighting a shift towards post-neoliberal policies emphasizing resilience and domestic production amid recent economic challenges and debates on effectiveness.

Read original articleLink Icon
The post-neoliberalism moment

The article discusses the decline of neoliberalism and the Washington Consensus in contemporary economic policy, highlighting a shift in attitudes among policymakers and economists. Historically, neoliberalism, characterized by deregulation and trade liberalization, was embraced across the political spectrum in the U.S. as a means to foster global economic interdependence. However, recent events, including the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical tensions, have led to a reevaluation of these policies. Critics argue that neoliberalism has failed to address significant economic shocks, such as the "China shock," which adversely affected U.S. manufacturing. New voices in economic discourse, like Adam Tooze and Rana Foroohar, advocate for a post-neoliberal approach that emphasizes resilience over efficiency. This shift is reflected in the Biden administration's policies, which prioritize domestic production and industrial policy. Despite the growing acceptance of post-neoliberal ideas, some economists caution against abandoning neoliberal principles entirely, arguing that the challenges faced are more about local responses to economic changes than the policies themselves. The article concludes that while the post-neoliberal paradigm is gaining traction, its efficacy remains debated.

- Neoliberalism and the Washington Consensus are increasingly viewed as outdated in U.S. economic policy.

- Recent global events have prompted a shift towards policies emphasizing resilience and domestic production.

- Critics of neoliberalism highlight its failure to mitigate economic shocks, leading to calls for a new economic paradigm.

- The Biden administration's policies reflect a departure from traditional neoliberal principles.

- The debate continues over the effectiveness of post-neoliberal ideas versus the merits of neoliberalism.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @incrudible - 8 months
The core neoliberal claim that the economy would thrive if government just got out of the way has been demolished by the events of the past three decades.

Has it though? Where did government get "out of the way"? Where did government "in the way" to make the economy thrive? What does it mean for an economy to thrive anyway? Is it more important for an economy to be efficient, or the people being (ostensibly) subjectively happier with it? After all, several poor countries rank among the happiest in the world.

The fact that neoliberalism has not shown itself to be a panacea should not be held against it, considering the lack of demonstrably superior alternatives.

By @fithisux - 8 months
Neoliberalism is judged by its successes or failures.
By @incomingpain - 8 months
Neoliberalism was popular like 40 years ago... the number of regulations and laws has greatly increased since Milton's time. It was never really tried.

Globalism replaced it and is now being dismantled as a failure. The USA withdraws from bretton woods and 'the west' is headed to a new economic theory. This started under obama and extended by everyone since. This does mean the USA won't be world police anymore and won't be involved in so many wars.

There are many hoping to be the replacement for globalism. Perhaps keynesian or neoclassical are what are perceived to be the current replacement, that's what is getting dismantled. What seems to be replacing it doesn't seem to have a name yet.

Probably going to be similar to laissez faire or austrian economics but I do expect a new name will be provided.