August 9th, 2024

Boeing Starliner Could Brick ISS Docking Port If Crew Abandons It

NASA is contemplating using SpaceX's Crew Dragon for astronaut return from the ISS due to Boeing's Starliner lacking autonomous undocking. Technical issues have delayed the Starliner's mission and Crew-9 launch.

Read original articleLink Icon
Boeing Starliner Could Brick ISS Docking Port If Crew Abandons It

NASA is facing challenges with Boeing's Starliner spacecraft, which currently lacks the autonomous undocking feature necessary for a safe return from the International Space Station (ISS). The agency is considering bringing astronauts Barry Wilmore and Suni Williams back to Earth using a SpaceX Crew Dragon, while leaving the Starliner to return empty. This decision is complicated by Boeing's intention to push a software update to the Starliner, which NASA fears could potentially render one of the ISS's docking ports inoperable. The Starliner mission has already been extended due to multiple technical issues, and NASA has delayed its decision on the spacecraft's return and the launch of the upcoming SpaceX Crew-9 mission. The Crew-9 launch may be postponed from August to September, possibly allowing for Wilmore and Williams to return on that mission. The current flight software on the Starliner is unable to perform an automated undocking, raising concerns about the spacecraft's flight-worthiness. The situation is further complicated by unresolved thruster failures on the Starliner, which Boeing has yet to address.

- NASA is considering using SpaceX Crew Dragon to return astronauts from the ISS instead of the Boeing Starliner.

- The Starliner lacks the necessary autonomous undocking feature due to a software update that could risk ISS docking port functionality.

- The Crew-9 mission launch may be delayed to accommodate the Starliner's situation.

- Technical issues have prolonged the Starliner's mission, with no clear return date established.

- Boeing has not clarified why the autonomous undocking capability was removed from the Starliner for the crew flight test.

Link Icon 14 comments
By @ChocolateGod - 2 months
Boeing need to stop being given contracts, from the Starliner issues on top of the various scandals with the quality control of their planes, it's clear to see they have no value in human life.
By @Aloha - 2 months
I get that there is probably a desire to solely blame Boeing for this - but this seems like as much of a Project Management and integration failure on the NASA side, as it does Boeing putting defective hardware/software into orbit.

It shouldn't have been allowed to happen, period.

I get that what I said will not be popular, but this has been the consensus of every previous thread on this topic that I've seen - NASA is sorta playing the role of a systems integrator here, and assumes the liability for defective components from their subcontractors, and has the ultimate supervision authority to decide if something can or cannot fly.

By @netsharc - 2 months
It amuses me that of course there's a standard for docking interoperability defined:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Docking_System_S...

And adapters:

> The International Docking Adapter (IDA) converts older Russian APAS-95 docking systems to the International Docking System Standard

Imagine flying all the way and then realizing you forgot your adapter...

By @RIMR - 2 months
I really want to know how a Starliner software update is going to "brick" the ISS Docking Port. This doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

Jalopnik doesn't really seem like an authoritative source on this, especially since the hyperlink they included when they talk about the "Bricking" issue links to some article about simulated decompression sickness that has nothing to do with the ISS docking port...

By @eschneider - 2 months
How could they possibly screw up so badly that a SW update would brick the thing? Did they forget the logic to just reboot to last good/factory FW in case of failure?

This feels like the story they're telling isn't the real story because that's just basic, basic shit that gets beaten on all the time during development.

By @greenavocado - 2 months
On the ground people need to build a jettison rig that they can install inside the Starliner, launch that rig with SpaceX up to the ISS, install the rig, jettison the Starliner, and finally come home with the SpaceX module. Any other way is certain death and the Russians won't help them.
By @devoutsalsa - 2 months
Maybe they can just leave it in place, cut a hole in the bottom, and install a new docking port!
By @numpad0 - 2 months
Wasn't this clarified in the teleconference that it only needs "mission load" upload, some sort of script change rather than software rebuild? The Ars article quoted seem to predate the conference. Isn't this kind of a stale news?
By @hansvm - 2 months
Hypothetically, if a private citizen bricked the ISS, what would my consequences be?
By @ChrisArchitect - 2 months
By @totaldude87 - 2 months
This is just getting worser and worser. Boeing needs to get its shit in place or stop doing moon shots. Imagine if this happens on mars, #BringbackBoeing
By @lenerdenator - 2 months
How's the share price?