August 13th, 2024

Solar PV with Battery Storage Cheaper Than Conventional Power Plants

A Fraunhofer Institute study shows solar photovoltaics with battery storage are now cheaper than coal and gas in Germany, with costs for renewables expected to decline further by 2045.

Read original articleLink Icon
Solar PV with Battery Storage Cheaper Than Conventional Power Plants

A recent study by the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE reveals that solar photovoltaics (PV) combined with battery storage are now more cost-effective than traditional coal and gas power plants in Germany. The study, which has been tracking electricity generation costs since 2010, indicates that ground-mounted PV systems and onshore wind turbines are the most economical, with costs ranging from 4.1 to 9.2 cents per kilowatt hour. The costs for PV battery systems vary between 6.0 and 22.5 cents per kilowatt hour, influenced by the price of battery systems and solar radiation levels. The analysis also forecasts that by 2045, costs for small PV roof systems could drop to between 4.9 and 10.4 cents per kilowatt hour. While renewable energy costs are expected to decline, flexible power plants, such as biogas and biomass, will still be necessary for backup, albeit at higher costs ranging from 20.2 to 43.3 cents per kilowatt hour. The study emphasizes the importance of integrating renewable energy sources with flexible technologies to achieve a climate-neutral energy system.

- Solar PV with battery storage is cheaper than coal and gas power plants.

- Ground-mounted PV systems and onshore wind are the most cost-effective energy sources in Germany.

- Electricity generation costs for renewables are projected to continue decreasing until 2045.

- Flexible power plants will be needed as backup but will have significantly higher costs.

- The study highlights the importance of combining renewable energy with flexible technologies for a sustainable energy future.

Related

One Year Since Germany's Nuclear Exit: Renewables Expand, Fossil Fuels Reduced

One Year Since Germany's Nuclear Exit: Renewables Expand, Fossil Fuels Reduced

One year after Germany's nuclear exit, Fraunhofer ISE reports increased renewable energy capacity, reduced fossil fuel electricity generation, and a cleaner energy mix. Renewable sources compensated for lost nuclear power, leading to a 26% decrease in non-renewable generation.

Germany – Coal generation at low during Q2 2024

Germany – Coal generation at low during Q2 2024

Germany's electricity generation decreased by 1.2% in Q2 2024, with renewables hitting a record high of 65.3%. Hydropower surged due to heavy rainfall, while wholesale prices dropped by 26.9%. Germany was a net importer, trading electricity with neighboring countries.

Germans Combat Climate Change with DIY Solar Panels

Germans Combat Climate Change with DIY Solar Panels

Germany is witnessing a rise in lightweight, plug-and-play solar panels, enabling individuals to generate electricity affordably. Over 500,000 systems installed, driven by regulations, rising electricity prices, and climate concerns.

Germans Combat Climate Change from Their Balconies

Germans Combat Climate Change from Their Balconies

Germany is witnessing a rise in lightweight, plug-and-play solar panels, enabling self-installation for electricity generation. Over 500,000 systems installed, driven by relaxed regulations and rising costs, promoting sustainability.

Germans Combat Climate Change with DIY Solar Panels

Germans Combat Climate Change with DIY Solar Panels

Germany is experiencing a rise in lightweight, plug-and-play solar panels, enabling self-installation and increasing solar capacity. Over 500,000 systems have been installed, promoting energy independence and sustainability.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @duffpkg - 2 months
I have a solar plus battery off grid setup at one of my homes. My comment that is the top on this item (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40877337) describes what I did for my solar setup. Two years in, everything has paid for itself. I expect the system to produce for 7-13 years without meaningful maintenance costs.

At the 7 year mark my cost per kwh will be below $0.02 . Power in my area (southwest US) is $0.12 per kwh. Some factors are complex to measure. Such as how much more I run the AC because it is essentially 'free' than I would if it were still $0.12 per kwh. Another complex factor is that I can generate much more power than I consume currently. If I found a sensible use for the surplus power then costs drop even lower even faster. My consumption is about 50% of max, on an annual basis.

By @brnt - 2 months
Seasonal battery storage is currently impossible, making PV very much not a year round thing (for those places with any significant winter and associated heating requirement). You just can't install a MWh battery in your home right now.
By @idiotsecant - 2 months
Clearly if this was true we wouldn't need thermal plants. That makes me think this is not true.