August 13th, 2024

Principles I Find Interesting

Johnny Webber discusses principles of human behavior, including mimetic desire, scarcity mindset, Occam’s Razor, and the Golden Rule, emphasizing empathy, simplicity, and the effectiveness of positive reinforcement over punishment.

Read original articleLink Icon
Principles I Find Interesting

Johnny Webber discusses several principles that he finds insightful for understanding human behavior and guiding personal conduct. He introduces the concept of mimetic desire, which suggests that people often want what others desire, influencing consumer culture. He critiques the scarcity mindset, arguing it leads to fear and competition, particularly in politics and sports. Webber highlights Occam’s Razor, emphasizing that simpler explanations are often more accurate, and Parkinson’s Law, which states that work expands to fill the time allotted for it. He also mentions Hanlon’s Razor, advising against attributing malice to actions that can be explained by ignorance. The spotlight effect illustrates how individuals overestimate others' attention to their flaws, while positive reinforcement is presented as a more effective teaching method than punishment. Finally, he underscores the Golden Rule, advocating for empathy and kindness in interactions with others.

- Mimetic desire drives consumer behavior, encouraging people to want what others desire.

- The scarcity mindset can lead to fear and competition, affecting political and social views.

- Simplicity in explanations is often more accurate, as suggested by Occam’s Razor.

- Positive reinforcement is more effective than punishment in encouraging desired behaviors.

- The Golden Rule emphasizes treating others with empathy and kindness.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @kbknight - 2 months
I would add Rob Henderson's "luxury beliefs." But also...

I think the bloggers account for "Parkinson's Law" is too simplistic. If it were just about procrastinators, it wouldn't be as useful. Deadlines (even artificial ones) work because we can always make a system a little cleaner, a little more efficient, with fewer bugs, well past the point where that work has any value.

By @000ooo000 - 2 months
>Occam’s Razor

>What is it? The simplest answer is most often correct.

Isn't it: for a given outcome, reached by two hypotheses, the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions is usually correct? Which isn't always necessarily the same as "simplest is usually correct", or at least how I commonly see it deployed.

I like Kant's response: "The variety of beings should not rashly be diminished".